It is well known that the Mahābhārata has two frame dialogues that introduce the main story. While some characteristics of the Mahābhārata, such as its Vedic status and authorship, are emphasised in both frame stories, other characteristics are developed in one frame story, but not the other. I will argue that the Ugraśravas narration establishes the text’s ontological status, while also presenting the story as having universal appeal. In contrast, Vaiśampāyaṇa’s narration presents the main story in historical terms, as a chronicle of the king’s own family, as well as in cosmological terms as the unfolding of a divine plan. Addressing the creative tensions between these hermeneutical lenses, I will argue that they work together to support the Mahābhārata’s claim to inclusivity and universality. Prof. Brian Collins (He/Him/His) Drs. Ram and Sushila Gawande Chair in Indian Religion and Philosophy Department of Classics and Religious Studies 234 Ellis Hall Ohio University Athens, Ohio 740-597-2103 (office) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: < http://listserv.ohio.edu/pipermail/aar-mbh/attachments/20241114/a35b496a/attachment-0001.html > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 1 Brian Black, Framing the Maha?bha?rata- How Do Ugras?ravas and Vais?ampa?yan?a Characterise the Main Story.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 258565 bytes Desc: 1 Brian Black, Framing the Maha?bha?rata- How Do Ugras?ravas and Vais?ampa?yan?a Characterise the Main Story.pdf URL: < http://listserv.ohio.edu/pipermail/aar-mbh/attachments/20241114/a35b496a/attachment-0001.pdf >
(740) 593–9381 | Building 21, The Ridges
Ohio University | Athens OH 45701 | 740.593.1000 ADA Compliance | © 2018 Ohio University . All rights reserved.