What is Arun Kolatkar’s reading of Janamejaya’s snake sacrifice and the burning of the Khandava forest, as depicted in the poem, Sarpa Satra (2004)? If the poem describes the snake sacrifice as “cynical,” a “mockery”, and a “grotesque parody” of a yajna, what would constitute a true, proper yajna? Why does Jaratkaru advise Astika to stop the sacrifice, not for the sake of the Nagas, but to save “the last vestige of humanity”? In addressing these questions, I will argue that although Sarpa Satra seems to present an anthropocentric understanding of dharma (in which human beings should live and let other species live), there are materials in the poem that suggest the contours of a non-anthropocentric vision of dharma (as that which sustains and promotes all life and the earth), an ideal that is more fully developed in the critical edition of the Mahabharata. Prof. Brian Collins (He/Him/His) Drs. Ram and Sushila Gawande Chair in Indian Religion and Philosophy Department of Classics and Religious Studies 234 Ellis Hall Ohio University Athens, Ohio 740-597-2103 (office) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: < http://listserv.ohio.edu/pipermail/aar-mbh/attachments/20241114/ef77fa51/attachment-0001.html > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 4 Shankar Ramaswami, Toward a Non-Anthropocentric Vision of Dharma.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 253021 bytes Desc: 4 Shankar Ramaswami, Toward a Non-Anthropocentric Vision of Dharma.pdf URL: < http://listserv.ohio.edu/pipermail/aar-mbh/attachments/20241114/ef77fa51/attachment-0001.pdf >
(740) 593–9381 | Building 21, The Ridges
Ohio University | Athens OH 45701 | 740.593.1000 ADA Compliance | © 2018 Ohio University . All rights reserved.