[CPN] first order of business for CPN

• Previous message: [CPN] first order of business for CPN
• Next message: [CPN] first order of business for CPN
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I also approve posting the proposal. I don't think that David's addition 
is necessary because the last sentence does mention "draft PhyloCode". I 
think that it is clear that this would not apply to the published code 
once its validity starts.

Michel

On 27/10/11 20:53, David Marjanovic wrote:
> I approve of posting the proposal. 
>  
>> I think we could approve its posting without implying that all future 
>> proposals have to be posted before they are considered by the CPN. 
>> In fact, I suggest that we word the question we are voting on to be 
>> explicit about this. Specifically, I suggest that we vote on the 
>> following question: (yes or no) "The CPN approves the posting on the 
>> ISPN website of the Cellinese et al. proposal regarding species, with 
>> the understanding that a vote of approval does not imply that all 
>> future proposals to the CPN for modification of the draft PhyloCode 
>> will be posted. 
> I think here we should insert "as long as it is still a draft" at the 
> end to prevent misunderstandings. 
>  
> Should my proposal be posted, too, or should it be considered a comment? 
> 
 
> CPN mailing list 
>  CPN at listserv.ohio.edu 
 
>  http://listserv.ohio.edu/mailman/listinfo/cpn 
 
>  
-- 
UMR 7207
Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle
Batiment de Géologie	
Case postale 48
43 rue Buffon
F-75231 Paris cedex 05
FRANCE http://tolweb.org/notes/?note_id=3669 

• Previous message: [CPN] first order of business for CPN
• Next message: [CPN] first order of business for CPN
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]