[CPN] proposal to eliminate apomorphy-based definitions

• Previous message: [CPN] proposal to eliminate apomorphy-based definitions
• Next message: [CPN] proposal to eliminate apomorphy-based definitions
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Well, they could be redefined, though the prefix would no longer make sense.  They could also just be eliminated.

KdQ


On 1/11/12 3:52 PM, "T. Michael Keesey" < keesey at gmail.com 
> wrote:

On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 12:50 PM, de Queiroz, Kevin < deQueirozK at si.edu 
> wrote:
> If certain types of definitions were later to be rejected, the names could then be redefined using a different type of definition. 
Not names with the prefix "Apo-" (Art. 10.7). Probably the only thing
you could do with them is to make them informal.

--
T. Michael Keesey http://tmkeesey.net/ 

• Previous message: [CPN] proposal to eliminate apomorphy-based definitions
• Next message: [CPN] proposal to eliminate apomorphy-based definitions
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]