[CPN] Discussion to incorporate elements of CMB proposal

• Previous message: [CPN] Discussion to incorporate elements of CMB proposal
• Next message: [CPN] Discussion to incorporate elements of CMB proposal
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I was one of the people who favored modifying the definition of the term "species" in the PhyloCode to make it more neutral, and that is basically the only change that I am in favor of.  Phil and I are about to propose rewordings of some of the definition types, one of which removes the term species; however, that change was not motivated by the CMB proposal.

Kevin


On 5/2/12 12:17 PM, "David C. Tank" < dtank at uidaho.edu 
> wrote:

In our vote to reject the CMB proposal, there was overwhelming support to identify aspects of the CMB proposal that could be incorporated into the code - so I would like to begin this discussion.

In responding, several people suggested a similar change that they would like to discuss - basically, a modification of the definition of the term "species" to make it more neutral with respect to species concepts.

Kevin, would you like to start this discussion?

Are there other aspects of CMB that we would like to consider for incorporation into the code?

Best,
Dave
_________________________________
David C. Tank
Assistant Professor & Director, Stillinger Herbarium
University of Idaho
208.885.7033 dtank at uidaho.edu 
 http://www.phylodiversity.net/dtank/ 

• Previous message: [CPN] Discussion to incorporate elements of CMB proposal
• Next message: [CPN] Discussion to incorporate elements of CMB proposal
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]