[CPN] Discussion to incorporate elements of CMB proposal

• Previous message: [CPN] Discussion to incorporate elements of CMB proposal
• Next message: [CPN] Discussion to incorporate elements of CMB proposal
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:30 PM, David Tank < dtank at uidaho.edu 
> wrote:
> Hi All, 
>  
> It's been brought to my attention that the results of the vote on the CMB 
> proposal have been made public: 
>  http://3lbmonkeybrain.blogspot.com/2012/05/phylocode-will-not-be-amended.html 
 
>  
> Clearly community discussion is what we wanted all along, but the 
> unfortunate thing is that the authors of the proposal found out about the 
> results of the vote not from us, but through the grapevine via this blog, 
> and they are not too happy about it. 
I apologize if my post caused trouble, but I didn't realize the
authors had not been informed. (Isn't one of them on this committee?)

In general I feel the Society could use some sort of defined pipeline
for disseminating information -- those of us on the Publicity
Committee recently started discussing this matter. Perhaps we should
open the discussion up to the ISPN mailing list?

-- 
T. Michael Keesey http://tmkeesey.net/ 

• Previous message: [CPN] Discussion to incorporate elements of CMB proposal
• Next message: [CPN] Discussion to incorporate elements of CMB proposal
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]