Dear colleagues, I had a quick look and these proposed changes look good to me. I have no other comment, at this point. Cheers, Michel On 24/09/12 17:15, Cantino, Philip wrote: > Dear CPN members, > > While the committee is voting on whether to delete Rec. 11.4B (see my previous email), we can also be discussing the next set of proposed changes that were stimulated by the CBM species proposal. Kevin and I have worked out wording for most of the changes that the CPN agreed to consider (see attached document). The only one we have not yet worked on is Art. 21, which will be more difficult. In the process of thinking about the attached changes, we noticed a few other related ones that we feel should be made in the glossary, and these are also included in the attached document. > > Please think about all the changes in the attachment and send your comments to the listserv. We are not yet voting on these; this is the discussion period. How about if we give ourselves two weeks for discussion? Unless someone asks for more time, I will call for a vote on Monday, Oct. 8. In the meanwhile, I will work on the proposed modifications to Art. 21, some of which came from me and some from David M. I don't know whether I will be able to complete these by Oct. 8 because I'll be out of town eight days of that period. > > Phil > > > > > >
> CPN mailing list > CPN at listserv.ohio.edu > http://listserv.ohio.edu/mailman/listinfo/cpn -- UMR 7207 Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle Batiment de Géologie Case postale 48 43 rue Buffon F-75231 Paris cedex 05 FRANCE http://www2.mnhn.fr/hdt203/info/laurin.php -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://listserv.ohio.edu/pipermail/cpn/attachments/20120924/ade32947/attachment-0001.html
(740) 593–9381 | Building 21, The Ridges
Ohio University | Athens OH 45701 | 740.593.1000 ADA Compliance | © 2018 Ohio University . All rights reserved.