The typo is just in my message, not in the document that I edited. Thanks for pointing it out, though. Phil On Apr 11, 2013, at 1:10 PM, David Marjanovic wrote: >> With this change, Art. 11.8 now reads: When a specimen that is not a type is used as a specifier in a phylogenetic definition, the institution or collection in which the specifier is conserved must be identified, as well as the collection number or other information needed to identity the specimen unambiguously. > > ...identi_f_y, not identi_t_y, I hope... :-] > >
> CPN mailing list > CPN at listserv.ohio.edu > http://listserv.ohio.edu/mailman/listinfo/cpn
(740) 593–9381 | Building 21, The Ridges
Ohio University | Athens OH 45701 | 740.593.1000 ADA Compliance | © 2018 Ohio University . All rights reserved.