I have to run now; I retract my vote for the time being because of the following points and will vote later today. > I am sorry that I did not have time to look at this text earlier. I > have problems with the formulation for apomorphy-based clades, in > which "synapomorphic with" was omitted of some kinds of allowed > definitions. This is a mistake in my opinion because it leaves > ambiguity; often, convergent apomorphies are indistinguishable from > synapomorphic ones. So "synapomorphic" MUST be present in such kinds > of definitions. I need to check. > The removal of minimal and maximal clades defined based on extinct > taxa is a big mistake, in my opinion. I think they aren't outlawed even by implication, but I have to check that, too.
(740) 593–9381 | Building 21, The Ridges
Ohio University | Athens OH 45701 | 740.593.1000 ADA Compliance | © 2018 Ohio University . All rights reserved.