Dear colleagues, I agree with the changes, though I would like to see the concerns raised by others (David, Sean, etc.) addressed. However, I agree that Kevin and Phil could go ahead with the current wording and fine-tune it in the coming weeks or months. Cheers, Michel On 07/11/13 15:01, Cantino, Philip wrote: > Dear CPN members, > > I have received a request that we delay the vote on these proposals > for a week. This is fine with me. It is important that everyone have > enough time to review and discuss the proposed changes, and people's > schedules and other commitments vary. I will call for a vote on > Friday, Nov. 15 unless discussion is still in progress at that time. > > Regards, > Phil > > Begin forwarded message: > >> *From: *"Cantino, Philip" < cantino at ohio.edu <mailto: cantino at ohio.edu >> >> *Subject: **additions to proposed modifications* >> *Date: *November 6, 2013 1:07:40 PM EST >> *To: *Committee on Phylogenetic Nomenclature < cpn at listserv.ohio.edu >> <mailto: cpn at listserv.ohio.edu >> >> >> Dear CPN members, >> >> In the attached version of the code, Kevin and I have added several >> other changes that were not in the version I sent you on Nov. 1. >> Some are in response to comments sent on Sept. 11 by David >> Marjanovic and the rest originated with us. >> >> The newly proposed modifications are highlighted in yellow so that >> you can easily find them (the are in Principle 6, Note 6.1A.1, Note >> 9.14A.2 Example 1, Rec. 11C, Art. 17.1, Art. 17.5, Art. 20.4 Example >> 1, Note 20.4.1 Example 1, the Glossary entries for "branch" and >> "node", and Appendix C). All are minor, so I don't anticipate it >> will take you long to check them. >> >> I am surprised not to have received any comments on the changes I >> sent Nov. 1. I hope this means that everyone is comfortable with the >> proposals. On Friday, I will call for a vote unless there is >> discussion ongoing at that time. The vote will be on the newly >> proposed changes (those highlighted in yellow) as well as those I >> sent on Nov. 1 (which are shown with Track Changes but without >> highlighting). >> >> Regards, >> Phil >> >> >> >> >> Begin forwarded message: >> >>> *From: *"Cantino, Philip" < cantino at ohio.edu <mailto: cantino at ohio.edu >> >>> *Date: *November 1, 2013 10:03:31 AM EDT >>> *To: *Committee on Phylogenetic Nomenclature < cpn at listserv.ohio.edu >>> <mailto: cpn at listserv.ohio.edu >> >>> *Subject: **Fwd: proposed modifications of PhyloCode* >>> >>> Dear CPN members, >>> >>> Just a reminder: If you have comments, they should be sent to this >>> listserv by next Friday (Nov. 8) so that there is an opportunity for >>> discussion before I call for a vote. No one has commented to date. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Phil >>> >>> Begin forwarded message: >>> >>>> *From: *"Cantino, Philip" < cantino at ohio.edu <mailto: cantino at ohio.edu >> >>>> *Date: *October 25, 2013 1:10:46 PM EDT >>>> *To: *Committee on Phylogenetic Nomenclature < cpn at listserv.ohio.edu >>>> <mailto: cpn at listserv.ohio.edu >> >>>> *Subject: **proposed modifications of PhyloCode* >>>> >>>> Dear CPN members, >>>> >>>> Over the past three-plus years since version 4c was posted online, >>>> Kevin and I have come to an agreement on a variety of >>>> modifications, some of them originating with one of us and some >>>> originating with other members of the CPN. There is no central >>>> theme to the proposals, as there has been for other sets of >>>> modifications the CPN has considered in the past two years (e.g., >>>> rules dealing with species; expansion of the section describing the >>>> kinds of definitions). >>>> >>>> The attached document consists of the most recently approved >>>> version of the code (i.e., including the modifications approved by >>>> the CPN last month), to which we have added the newly proposed >>>> changes using the Track Changes function of MS-Word. If there is >>>> anyone who does not have MS-Word or an equivalent package that >>>> allows you to see the tracked changes, please let me know. The >>>> Preface and Index are not included in this document. >>>> >>>> The proposed changes occur in the Preamble, Articles 6, 7, 9 >>>> (beginning with 9.8), 10, 11, 12.2, 14, 15.11.1 Example 1, Rec. >>>> 17.3A, 19, 20.8, 21, 22, Glossary, Appendix A, and Appendix C. >>>> Although there are many changes, the vast majority of them are >>>> minor (e.g., updating the abbreviation for the botanical code in >>>> umpteen places; clarifications that don't affect content, >>>> additional parenthetical references to other parts of the code). >>>> There are a few more substantive changes proposed, but we >>>> anticipate that most and perhaps all of them will be uncontroversial. >>>> >>>> Don't be concerned about formatting errors in this document (e.g., >>>> page breaks in inappropriate places; use of different fonts); these >>>> will be fixed later. >>>> >>>> We don't anticipate that it will take you very long to review these >>>> proposed changes because most are not substantive. Two weeks >>>> should be more than adequate unless some of you are traveling >>>> without email access during this period. I suggest Friday, Nov. 8 >>>> as the target date for comments. If this is difficult for some of >>>> you, or if discussion on some points is still ongoing on that date, >>>> we can extend the deadline. >>>> >>>> Thank you, all. >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> Phil >>>> >>> >> > > > >
> CPN mailing list > CPN at listserv.ohio.edu > http://listserv.ohio.edu/mailman/listinfo/cpn -- Michel Laurin UMR 7207 Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle Batiment de Géologie Case postale 48 43 rue Buffon F-75231 Paris cedex 05 FRANCE http://www2.mnhn.fr/hdt203/info/laurin.php -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://listserv.ohio.edu/pipermail/cpn/attachments/20131116/a7b9ed35/attachment.html
(740) 593–9381 | Building 21, The Ridges
Ohio University | Athens OH 45701 | 740.593.1000 ADA Compliance | © 2018 Ohio University . All rights reserved.