[CPN] Fwd: extension on time to review and discuss proposals
Michel Laurin michel.laurin at upmc.frSat Nov 16 09:46:55 EST 2013
- Previous message: [CPN] Fwd: extension on time to review and discuss proposals
- Next message: [CPN] Fwd: extension on time to review and discuss proposals
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I also vote yes. Michel On 16/11/13 15:29, Brian Andres wrote: > I vote yes. > > (B) > > On Nov 16, 2013, at 9:09 AM, Cantino, Philip < cantino at ohio.edu > <mailto: cantino at ohio.edu >> wrote: > >> Dear CPN members, >> >> At this point, I am calling for a vote on the current set of >> proposals. We have already received votes of approval from Jim, >> Andy, Miecz, Nico, and Michel. I vote yes of course, and I assume >> that Kevin does since he and I proposed the changes. It would be >> good for Sean and David to say whether they approve of moving ahead >> with the changes with the understanding that Kevin and I will >> consider the specific suggestions they have made and report back to >> all of you. There are three CPN members who have not commented on >> the proposals. Please vote by Wednesday (Nov. 20) if you intend to. >> Thank you. >> >> Regards, >> Phil >> >> Begin forwarded message: >> >>> *From: *"Cantino, Philip" < cantino at ohio.edu <mailto: cantino at ohio.edu >> >>> *Subject: **Fwd: extension on time to review and discuss proposals* >>> *Date: *November 15, 2013 10:20:20 AM EST >>> *To: *Committee on Phylogenetic Nomenclature < cpn at listserv.ohio.edu >>> <mailto: cpn at listserv.ohio.edu >> >>> >>> Dear CPN members, >>> >>> Today is the last day for comments on this set of proposals. I have >>> seen responses from Jim Doyle, Miecz Wolsan, Sean Graham, Andy >>> Anderson and David Marjanovic. If other people have comments before >>> we vote, please send them today. >>> >>> Because some wording changes have been suggested by two of you, but >>> Kevin and I may not have time to discuss them right away, the >>> approach I would like to take (if there are no objections) is to go >>> ahead and call a vote with the understanding that Kevin and I will >>> subsequently respond to the points Sean and David (and any others >>> who comment today) have made. These points can be discussed on this >>> listserv until consensus is reached or, if necessary, another vote >>> is called on just those points. That way, I can go ahead and >>> incorporate all the changes on which there is no disagreement. I'd >>> rather not hold up the vote on things that everyone agrees on. >>> >>> Phil >>> >>> >>> Begin forwarded message: >>> >>>> *From: *"Cantino, Philip" < cantino at ohio.edu <mailto: cantino at ohio.edu >> >>>> *Date: *November 7, 2013 9:01:01 AM EST >>>> *To: *Committee on Phylogenetic Nomenclature < cpn at listserv.ohio.edu >>>> <mailto: cpn at listserv.ohio.edu >> >>>> *Subject: **extension on time to review and discuss proposals* >>>> >>>> Dear CPN members, >>>> >>>> I have received a request that we delay the vote on these proposals >>>> for a week. This is fine with me. It is important that everyone >>>> have enough time to review and discuss the proposed changes, and >>>> people's schedules and other commitments vary. I will call for a >>>> vote on Friday, Nov. 15 unless discussion is still in progress at >>>> that time. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Phil >>>> >>>> Begin forwarded message: >>>> >>>>> *From: *"Cantino, Philip" < cantino at ohio.edu <mailto: cantino at ohio.edu >> >>>>> *Subject: **additions to proposed modifications* >>>>> *Date: *November 6, 2013 1:07:40 PM EST >>>>> *To: *Committee on Phylogenetic Nomenclature >>>>> < cpn at listserv.ohio.edu <mailto: cpn at listserv.ohio.edu >> >>>>> >>>>> Dear CPN members, >>>>> >>>>> In the attached version of the code, Kevin and I have added >>>>> several other changes that were not in the version I sent you on >>>>> Nov. 1. Some are in response to comments sent on Sept. 11 by >>>>> David Marjanovic and the rest originated with us. >>>>> >>>>> The newly proposed modifications are highlighted in yellow so that >>>>> you can easily find them (the are in Principle 6, Note 6.1A.1, >>>>> Note 9.14A.2 Example 1, Rec. 11C, Art. 17.1, Art. 17.5, Art. 20.4 >>>>> Example 1, Note 20.4.1 Example 1, the Glossary entries for >>>>> "branch" and "node", and Appendix C). All are minor, so I don't >>>>> anticipate it will take you long to check them. >>>>> >>>>> I am surprised not to have received any comments on the changes I >>>>> sent Nov. 1. I hope this means that everyone is comfortable with >>>>> the proposals. On Friday, I will call for a vote unless there is >>>>> discussion ongoing at that time. The vote will be on the newly >>>>> proposed changes (those highlighted in yellow) as well as those I >>>>> sent on Nov. 1 (which are shown with Track Changes but without >>>>> highlighting). >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Phil >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Begin forwarded message: >>>>> >>>>>> *From: *"Cantino, Philip" < cantino at ohio.edu >>>>>> <mailto: cantino at ohio.edu >> >>>>>> *Date: *November 1, 2013 10:03:31 AM EDT >>>>>> *To: *Committee on Phylogenetic Nomenclature >>>>>> < cpn at listserv.ohio.edu <mailto: cpn at listserv.ohio.edu >> >>>>>> *Subject: **Fwd: proposed modifications of PhyloCode* >>>>>> >>>>>> Dear CPN members, >>>>>> >>>>>> Just a reminder: If you have comments, they should be sent to >>>>>> this listserv by next Friday (Nov. 8) so that there is an >>>>>> opportunity for discussion before I call for a vote. No one has >>>>>> commented to date. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Phil >>>>>> >>>>>> Begin forwarded message: >>>>>> >>>>>>> *From: *"Cantino, Philip" < cantino at ohio.edu >>>>>>> <mailto: cantino at ohio.edu >> >>>>>>> *Date: *October 25, 2013 1:10:46 PM EDT >>>>>>> *To: *Committee on Phylogenetic Nomenclature >>>>>>> < cpn at listserv.ohio.edu <mailto: cpn at listserv.ohio.edu >> >>>>>>> *Subject: **proposed modifications of PhyloCode* >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Dear CPN members, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Over the past three-plus years since version 4c was posted >>>>>>> online, Kevin and I have come to an agreement on a variety of >>>>>>> modifications, some of them originating with one of us and some >>>>>>> originating with other members of the CPN. There is no central >>>>>>> theme to the proposals, as there has been for other sets of >>>>>>> modifications the CPN has considered in the past two years >>>>>>> (e.g., rules dealing with species; expansion of the section >>>>>>> describing the kinds of definitions). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The attached document consists of the most recently approved >>>>>>> version of the code (i.e., including the modifications approved >>>>>>> by the CPN last month), to which we have added the newly >>>>>>> proposed changes using the Track Changes function of MS-Word. >>>>>>> If there is anyone who does not have MS-Word or an equivalent >>>>>>> package that allows you to see the tracked changes, please let >>>>>>> me know. The Preface and Index are not included in this document. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The proposed changes occur in the Preamble, Articles 6, 7, 9 >>>>>>> (beginning with 9.8), 10, 11, 12.2, 14, 15.11.1 Example 1, Rec. >>>>>>> 17.3A, 19, 20.8, 21, 22, Glossary, Appendix A, and Appendix C. >>>>>>> Although there are many changes, the vast majority of them are >>>>>>> minor (e.g., updating the abbreviation for the botanical code in >>>>>>> umpteen places; clarifications that don't affect content, >>>>>>> additional parenthetical references to other parts of the code). >>>>>>> There are a few more substantive changes proposed, but we >>>>>>> anticipate that most and perhaps all of them will be >>>>>>> uncontroversial. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Don't be concerned about formatting errors in this document >>>>>>> (e.g., page breaks in inappropriate places; use of different >>>>>>> fonts); these will be fixed later. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We don't anticipate that it will take you very long to review >>>>>>> these proposed changes because most are not substantive. Two >>>>>>> weeks should be more than adequate unless some of you are >>>>>>> traveling without email access during this period. I suggest >>>>>>> Friday, Nov. 8 as the target date for comments. If this is >>>>>>> difficult for some of you, or if discussion on some points is >>>>>>> still ongoing on that date, we can extend the deadline. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thank you, all. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>> Phil >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >> <PhyloCode4c3a.doc><PhyloCode4c3.doc>_______________________________________________ >> CPN mailing list >> CPN at listserv.ohio.edu <mailto: CPN at listserv.ohio.edu > >> http://listserv.ohio.edu/mailman/listinfo/cpn > > > >
> CPN mailing list > CPN at listserv.ohio.edu > http://listserv.ohio.edu/mailman/listinfo/cpn -- Michel Laurin UMR 7207 Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle Batiment de Géologie Case postale 48 43 rue Buffon F-75231 Paris cedex 05 FRANCE http://www2.mnhn.fr/hdt203/info/laurin.php -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://listserv.ohio.edu/pipermail/cpn/attachments/20131116/52fa373c/attachment-0001.html
- Previous message: [CPN] Fwd: extension on time to review and discuss proposals
- Next message: [CPN] Fwd: extension on time to review and discuss proposals
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CPN mailing list