[CPN] Proposed New Articles Regarding Panclade Names

    Graham, Sean swgraham at mail.ubc.ca
    Thu Oct 4 03:06:09 EDT 2018 
    Jim's points make sense to me; otherwise OK by me too,

Sean

________________________________
From: CPN [ cpn-bounces at listserv.ohio.edu 
] on behalf of James Doyle [ jadoyle at ucdavis.edu 
]
Sent: October-03-18 10:35 PM
To: de Queiroz, Kevin
Cc: cpn at listserv.ohio.edu 
; mclanger at ffclrp.usp.br 
Subject: Re: [CPN] Proposed New Articles Regarding Panclade Names

Hello Kevin,

This looks fine, except that in line 3 of Article 14.5, “panclade” should be “panclade names,” shouldn’t it?

In line 3 of 14.2, do you mean “precedence of a crown clade name on which a panclade name is based”? Or is it understood that this is what "precedence of a panclade name" means? Maybe I’m just being a little slow late in the evening.

Jim

On Oct 3, 2018, at 1:42 PM, de Queiroz, Kevin < deQueirozK at si.edu 
<mailto: deQueirozK at si.edu 
>> wrote:

Dear CPN members,

As the result of a case that emerged while editing some of the last contributions to the Phylonyms volume, it seemed necessary to draft a couple of new articles to maintain the relationships between panclade names and the names of the corresponding crown clades, which Phil and I are now submitting to the CPN for approval.  Please comment on or approve these new articles by October 17.  Thanks.

Kevin de Queiroz
<Proposed New Articles 10.7 & 14.5.docx>_______________________________________________
CPN mailing list CPN at listserv.ohio.edu 
<mailto: CPN at listserv.ohio.edu 
> http://listserv.ohio.edu/mailman/listinfo/cpn 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: < http://listserv.ohio.edu/pipermail/cpn/attachments/20181004/47a037a5/attachment.html 
>
    More information about the CPN mailing list
    View Site in Mobile | Classic
    Share by: