[CPN] Ratification of the PhyloCode

• Previous message: [CPN] Ratification of the PhyloCode
• Next message: [CPN] Ratification of the PhyloCode
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I vote yes ...

Em seg, 21 de jan de 2019 às 15:11, Richard G. Olmstead < olmstead at uw.edu 
>
escreveu:

> I vote YES! 
>  
> Thanks to everyone for your work on this, and especially to Phil and 
> Kevin, who have carried the heaviest load. 
>  
> Cheers, 
> Dick 
>  
>  
> On Jan 21, 2019, at 5:35 AM, Cantino, Philip < cantino at ohio.edu 
> wrote: 
>  
> Dear CPN members, 
>  
> No one asked for a delay in calling for a vote to ratify the code.  The 
> only comments since my Jan. 17 message (copied below) came from Max.  Thank 
> you, Max, for your very careful reading.  Kevin and I will check all of the 
> items Max pointed out (mostly typos and wording inconsistencies) and make 
> changes as needed.  However, none of the points he raised affect the 
> functioning of the code, and Max said he is ready to vote regardless, so I 
> see no reason to wait any longer. 
>  
> Please respond to this email with a Yes or No vote to ratify the code.  It 
> would be great if everyone would vote within a week, i.e., by next Monday, 
> Jan. 28. 
>  
> Best regards, 
> Phil 
>  
>  
> On Jan 17, 2019, at 11:05 AM, Cantino, Philip < cantino at ohio.edu 
> wrote: 
>  
> Dear CPN members, 
>  
> Today is the target date I suggested to start a vote to ratify the code. 
> I initially sent it to you on Dec. 17, and I sent a revised version on 
> January 8 that differed only in the addition of the Preface and revisions 
> of Art. 11.9 and Appendix A.  There was a delay of a couple of days in that 
> second email because the file was too large.  Hopefully, though, you all 
> received it by January 11.  Dick Olmstead sent me a couple of small changes 
> in the Preface, but other than that, I haven’t heard from any of you. 
>  
> How do you want to proceed?  Do you feel ready to vote now or do you want 
> more time to read it?  Bear in mind that you or previous CPN memberships 
> approved everything that is in the code other than the current versions of 
> the Preface and Appendix A.  However, within reason, I would like the vote 
> to wait until everyone who wants to read the code carefully has time to do 
> so. 
>  
> If you do NOT want me to call for a vote soon (let’s say next Monday), 
> please respond to this message and suggest a date that would be realistic 
> for you.  *I will interpret a lack of response to mean agreement that I 
> can call for a vote on Monday*. 
>  
> Best regards, 
> Phil 
>  
>  
> Philip D. Cantino 
> Department of Environmental and Plant Biology 
> Ohio University 
> Athens, OH 45701-2979 
>  
> Phone: (740) 593-1128 
> Fax: (740) 593-1130 
> email: cantino at ohio.edu 
< cantino at ohio.edu 
> 
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
> 
 
> CPN mailing list 
>  CPN at listserv.ohio.edu 
 
>  http://listserv.ohio.edu/mailman/listinfo/cpn 
 
>  
>  
> Richard Olmstead 
> Professor of Biology and Herbarium Curator, Burke Museum 
> Department of Biology 
> Box 355325 
> University of Washington 
> Seattle, WA 98195 
>  
> office: 423 Hitchcock Hall 
> phone: 206-543-8850 
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
-- 
Max Cardoso Langer Ph.D. (Bristol, UK)
Departamento de Biologia
Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciencias e Letras de Ribeirao Preto
Universidade de Sao Paulo (USP)
Av. Bandeirantes  3900
14040-901     Ribeirao Preto,  SP,  BRAZIL

Phone: +55 16 3315 3844
FAX: +55 16 3315 4886 http://sites.ffclrp.usp.br/paleo/ 
*A semântica é o último refúgio dos canalhas.*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: < http://listserv.ohio.edu/pipermail/cpn/attachments/20190124/ee4945b9/attachment.html 
>

• Previous message: [CPN] Ratification of the PhyloCode
• Next message: [CPN] Ratification of the PhyloCode
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]