[CPN] Ratification of the PhyloCode

• Previous message: [CPN] Ratification of the PhyloCode
• Next message: [CPN] Ratification of the PhyloCode
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

A YES for me too.

All the best,
George

/Dr George Sangster//
//Department of Bioinformatics and Genetics,//
//Swedish Museum of Natural History,//
//P.O. Box 50007,//
//SE–104 05//
//Stockholm, Sweden //
//// https://www.researchgate.net/profile/George_Sangster// 
/

Op 26-1-2019 om 20:09 schreef Adl, Sina:
>  
> Yes, Sina 
>  
> *Sina Adl **Professor* 
>  
> Department of Soil Sciences 
>  
> College of Agriculture and Bioresources 
>  
>   University of Saskatchewan 
>  
>   (306) 966-6866 
>  
> *agbio.usask.ca < http://agbio.usask.ca/ 
>* 
>  
> Editor-in-Chief, *Rhizosphere* 
>  
>  http://www.journals.elsevier.com/rhizosphere/ 
 
>  
> *From:*CPN < cpn-bounces at listserv.ohio.edu 
> *On Behalf Of *Cantino, Philip 
> *Sent:* Monday, January 21, 2019 07:35 
> *To:* Committee on Phylogenetic Nomenclature < cpn at listserv.ohio.edu 
> 
> *Cc:* Max Langer < mclanger at ffclrp.usp.br 
> 
> *Subject:* Re: [CPN] Ratification of the PhyloCode 
>  
> Dear CPN members, 
>  
> No one asked for a delay in calling for a vote to ratify the code. 
>  The only comments since my Jan. 17 message (copied below) came from 
> Max.  Thank you, Max, for your very careful reading.  Kevin and I will 
> check all of the items Max pointed out (mostly typos and wording 
> inconsistencies) and make changes as needed.  However, none of the 
> points he raised affect the functioning of the code, and Max said he 
> is ready to vote regardless, so I see no reason to wait any longer. 
>  
> Please respond to this email with a Yes or No vote to ratify the code. 
>  It would be great if everyone would vote within a week, i.e., by next 
> Monday, Jan. 28. 
>  
> Best regards, 
>  
> Phil 
>  
>  
>  
> On Jan 17, 2019, at 11:05 AM, Cantino, Philip < cantino at ohio.edu 
 
> <mailto: cantino at ohio.edu 
>> wrote: 
>  
> Dear CPN members, 
>  
> Today is the target date I suggested to start a vote to ratify the 
> code.  I initially sent it to you on Dec. 17, and I sent a revised 
> version on January 8 that differed only in the addition of the 
> Preface and revisions of Art. 11.9 and Appendix A.  There was a 
> delay of a couple of days in that second email because the file 
> was too large.  Hopefully, though, you all received it by January 
> 11.  Dick Olmstead sent me a couple of small changes in the 
> Preface, but other than that, I haven’t heard from any of you. 
>  
> How do you want to proceed?  Do you feel ready to vote now or do 
> you want more time to read it?  Bear in mind that you or previous 
> CPN memberships approved everything that is in the code other than 
> the current versions of the Preface and Appendix A.  However, 
> within reason, I would like the vote to wait until everyone who 
> wants to read the code carefully has time to do so. 
>  
> If you do NOT want me to call for a vote soon (let’s say next 
> Monday), please respond to this message and suggest a date that 
> would be realistic for you. _I will interpret a lack of response 
> to mean agreement that I can call for a vote on Monday_. 
>  
> Best regards, 
>  
> Phil 
>  
> Philip D. Cantino 
> Department of Environmental and Plant Biology 
> Ohio University 
> Athens, OH 45701-2979 
>  
> Phone: (740) 593-1128 
> Fax: (740) 593-1130 
> email: cantino at ohio.edu 
<mailto: cantino at ohio.edu 
> 
>  
>  
> 
 
> CPN mailing list 
>  CPN at listserv.ohio.edu 
 
>  http://listserv.ohio.edu/mailman/listinfo/cpn 
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: < http://listserv.ohio.edu/pipermail/cpn/attachments/20190126/0632d64b/attachment.html 
>

• Previous message: [CPN] Ratification of the PhyloCode
• Next message: [CPN] Ratification of the PhyloCode
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]