<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
On 25.08.2012 18:20, David Tank wrote:<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:D3C9FFE5-7E17-4C8A-8533-B0AC94CF37F4@uidaho.edu"
type="cite">Dear CPN -
<div><br>
</div>
<div>After too long of a lag, we need to come back to the 'CBM
species proposal' and wrap this up. The Cellinese et al.
Systematic Biology paper is now published (Syst
Biol 61(5):885-891).</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>When we last left this, there were only two changes that the
CPN agreed to consider:</div>
<div><br>
</div>
[...]
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Please take the time to re-familiarize yourself with the
proposal and respond with any general categories of changes by <b>Monday,
September 3</b>.</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Oops. I was busy that week...<br>
<br>
For the record, I agree with Phil and Michel that "we broaden it to
Art. 21 in general rather than David M's specific recommendations,
because other people may have additional changes to recommend in
this article".<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:D3C9FFE5-7E17-4C8A-8533-B0AC94CF37F4@uidaho.edu"
type="cite">
<div>Once we agree on which points we are going to consider, we
will then deal with the specific wording/additions to the
PhyloCode before sharing them with the authors of the original
proposal.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thanks much and best,</div>
<div>Dave<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
So: should I, in my function as Secretary, officially inform the
authors of anything yet? During a summer full of absences and other
timesinks, I haven't done so.<br>
</body>
</html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
On 25.08.2012 18:20, David Tank wrote:<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:D3C9FFE5-7E17-4C8A-8533-B0AC94CF37F4@uidaho.edu"
type="cite">Dear CPN -
<div><br>
</div>
<div>After too long of a lag, we need to come back to the 'CBM
species proposal' and wrap this up. The Cellinese et al.
Systematic Biology paper is now published (Syst
Biol 61(5):885-891).</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>When we last left this, there were only two changes that the
CPN agreed to consider:</div>
<div><br>
</div>
[...]
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Please take the time to re-familiarize yourself with the
proposal and respond with any general categories of changes by <b>Monday,
September 3</b>.</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Oops. I was busy that week...<br>
<br>
For the record, I agree with Phil and Michel that "we broaden it to
Art. 21 in general rather than David M's specific recommendations,
because other people may have additional changes to recommend in
this article".<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:D3C9FFE5-7E17-4C8A-8533-B0AC94CF37F4@uidaho.edu"
type="cite">
<div>Once we agree on which points we are going to consider, we
will then deal with the specific wording/additions to the
PhyloCode before sharing them with the authors of the original
proposal.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thanks much and best,</div>
<div>Dave<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
So: should I, in my function as Secretary, officially inform the
authors of anything yet? During a summer full of absences and other
timesinks, I haven't done so.<br>
</body>
</html>