<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Dear colleagues,<br>
<br>
I agree with the changes, but I propose two minor wording
changes (pp. 4 and 28), and I found a minor format (font size)
problem on p. 85. These are tracked and appear in a different
color than Phil's changes.<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
<br>
Michel<br>
<br>
On 21/02/13 20:06, Philip Cantino wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:9EF54AC0-4CDB-4D57-B4DC-0440AC5FD1C2@gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Dear CPN members,
Another left over from last year's discussions is use of the term "taxon" in the PhyloCode. In a Sept. 29 message, David M. suggested that "taxon" be defined differently than it currently is. He also suggested that many of the uses of "taxon" and "taxa" in the code could be omitted or replaced with "clade" and "clades". Kevin and I agree with David's suggestion in general but not in every particular.
I have attached two files to this message. The one that I encourage you to read first is "Taxon and Art. 1.1.docx", which provides the current wordings of Art. 1.1 and the glossary definition of "taxon", and and our proposed new wordings. The new wordings will bring the article and the glossary entry into full agreement, which is not currently the case. The new wording also makes it clearer that the term "taxon" has a general meaning in systematics that extends beyond this code.
The file called "Taxon"-related changes.doc includes the entire code (vers. 4c) with scattered minor wording changes, most of which relate to the word "taxon". You will need to turn on the Track Changes function of Word to see the changes in this document.
Please look these two documents over soon and send your comments to the listserv. Let's tentatively set Feb. 26 (next Tuesday) as a target date to call a vote unless substantial discussion develops before then. If anyone would like more time, please let me know.
Phil
</pre>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
CPN mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:CPN@listserv.ohio.edu">CPN@listserv.ohio.edu</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://listserv.ohio.edu/mailman/listinfo/cpn">http://listserv.ohio.edu/mailman/listinfo/cpn</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
UMR 7207
Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle
Batiment de Géologie
Case postale 48
43 rue Buffon
F-75231 Paris cedex 05
FRANCE
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www2.mnhn.fr/hdt203/info/laurin.php">http://www2.mnhn.fr/hdt203/info/laurin.php</a></pre>
</body>
</html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Dear colleagues,<br>
<br>
I agree with the changes, but I propose two minor wording
changes (pp. 4 and 28), and I found a minor format (font size)
problem on p. 85. These are tracked and appear in a different
color than Phil's changes.<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
<br>
Michel<br>
<br>
On 21/02/13 20:06, Philip Cantino wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:9EF54AC0-4CDB-4D57-B4DC-0440AC5FD1C2@gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Dear CPN members,
Another left over from last year's discussions is use of the term "taxon" in the PhyloCode. In a Sept. 29 message, David M. suggested that "taxon" be defined differently than it currently is. He also suggested that many of the uses of "taxon" and "taxa" in the code could be omitted or replaced with "clade" and "clades". Kevin and I agree with David's suggestion in general but not in every particular.
I have attached two files to this message. The one that I encourage you to read first is "Taxon and Art. 1.1.docx", which provides the current wordings of Art. 1.1 and the glossary definition of "taxon", and and our proposed new wordings. The new wordings will bring the article and the glossary entry into full agreement, which is not currently the case. The new wording also makes it clearer that the term "taxon" has a general meaning in systematics that extends beyond this code.
The file called "Taxon"-related changes.doc includes the entire code (vers. 4c) with scattered minor wording changes, most of which relate to the word "taxon". You will need to turn on the Track Changes function of Word to see the changes in this document.
Please look these two documents over soon and send your comments to the listserv. Let's tentatively set Feb. 26 (next Tuesday) as a target date to call a vote unless substantial discussion develops before then. If anyone would like more time, please let me know.
Phil
</pre>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
CPN mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:CPN@listserv.ohio.edu">CPN@listserv.ohio.edu</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://listserv.ohio.edu/mailman/listinfo/cpn">http://listserv.ohio.edu/mailman/listinfo/cpn</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
UMR 7207
Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle
Batiment de Géologie
Case postale 48
43 rue Buffon
F-75231 Paris cedex 05
FRANCE
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www2.mnhn.fr/hdt203/info/laurin.php">http://www2.mnhn.fr/hdt203/info/laurin.php</a></pre>
</body>
</html>