Course Web Page

Course: MATH 3070/5070

Title: Number Theory

Section: 100 (Class Numbers 7104/7126

Campus: Ohio University, Athens Campus

Department: Mathematics

Academic Year: 2022 - 2023

Term: Fall Semester

Instructor: Mark Barsamian

Contact Information: My contact information is posted on my web page .

Course Description: Investigation of properties of the natural numbers. Topics include mathematical induction, factorization, Euclidean algorithm, Diophantine equations, congruences, divisibility, multiplicative functions, and applications to cryptography.

Prerequisites: CS 3000 or MATH 3050

Special Needs: If you have physical, psychiatric, or learning disabilities that require accommodations, please let me know as soon as possible so that your needs may be appropriately met.

Class Format:

  • Reading and Videos: Students will learn the mathematical content for the course by reading the book and watching instructional videos developed by the instructor, Mark Barsamian.
  • In-Person Meetings: Held Mon,Wed,Fri 10:45 - 11:40am in Morton 218, the class meetings will be used mainly for discussion . Attendance is required.

Final Exam Date: Mon Dec 5, 2022 from 10:10am to 12:10pm in Morton 218


Syllabus: This web page replaces the usual paper syllabus. If you need a paper syllabus (now or in the future), unhide the next two portions of hidden content (Textbook, Grading) and then print this web page.

Textbook Information:

Textbook Information for 2022 - 2023 Fall Semester MATH 3070

Title: Discrete Mathematics with Applications, 4 th Edition

Author: Suzanna Epp

Publisher: Brooks/Cole (Cengage Learning), 2010

ISBN-10: 0495391328

ISBN-13: 978-0495391326

The book is widely-available at a huge range of prices. Save money by getting a used copy. (And note that we are not using the most recent edition of the text. This should help make used copies quite cheap.)


List of all Suggested Exercises:

Suggested Exercises for 2022 - 2023 Fall Semester MATH 3070

The Suggested Exercises, shown in the list below, are selected from the textbook. These problems are not to be turned in and are not part of your grade. But in order to learn the material covered in the course, you should do as many of the suggested problems as possible and keep your solutions in a notebook for study

  • Epp 4th Edition Section 1.1 Variables: #2,6,11,13
  • Epp 4th Edition Section 2.1 Logical form and Logical Equivalence: #8,22,26,28,33,34,42,45 ( video ) ( notes )
  • Epp 4th Edition Section 2.2 Conditional Statements: #8,15,{20b,22b,23b},21,33,35,41,43 ( video ) ( notes )
  • Epp 4th Edition Section 2.3 Valid and Invalid Arguments (Argument Forms): #9,15,23,29,31,32 ( video ) ( notes )
  • Epp 4th Edition Section 3.1 Predicates and Quantified Statements I: #4,5,10,16,18,22,29 ( video ) ( notes )
  • Epp 4th Edition Section 3.2 Predicates and Quantified Statements II: #4,10,15,17,25,27,38,44 ( video ) ( notes )
  • Epp 4th Edition Section 3.3 Statements with Multiple Quantifiers: #2,3,6,17,19,20,23,26,30,38 ( video ) ( notes )
  • Epp 4th Edition Section 3.4 Arguments with Quantified Statements: #4,11,13,15,17,18,20,22,26
  • Epp 4th Edition Section 4.1 Direct Proof and Counterexample I: Introduction:
    • Exercises from Epp 4th Edition Section 4.1: # 4, 11, 16, 20, 22, 24, 25, 29, 31, 33, 35, 43, 44, 45, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 56, 57, 58
    • Video for Epp 5th Edition Section 4.1 = Epp 4th Edition Section 4.1: ( Video ) ( Notes )
    • Video for Epp 5th Edition Section 4.2 = more topics from Epp 4th Edition Section 4.1: ( Video ) ( Notes )
  • Epp 4th Edition Section 4.2 Direct Proof and Counterexample II: Rational Numbers:
    • Exercises from Epp 4th Edition Section 4.2: # 2, 4, 6, 9, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 28, 31, 33
    • Video: Video for Epp 5th Edition Section 4.3 = Topics from Epp 4th Edition Section 4.2 ( link to video ) ( Link to Notes )
  • Epp 4th Edition Section 4.3 Direct Proof and Counterexample III: Divibility:
    • Homework: Problems from Epp 4th Edition Section 4.3 # 2,3,4,12,15,16,19,20,24,26,27,28,29,30,32,36,37,38,41,47,48
    • Video: Video for Epp 5th Edition Section 4.4 = Topics from Epp 4th Edition Section 4.3 ( link to video ) ( Link to Notes )
  • Epp 4th Edition Section 4.4 Direct Proof and Counterexample V: Division into Cases and the Quotient Remainder Theorem:
    • Exercises from Epp 4th Edition Section 4.4 Direct Proof and Counterexample V: # 1,3,5,7,10,13,14,17,20,23,25,27,28a,29,9036,37,38,39
    • Video: Video for Epp 5th Edition Section 4.5 = Topics from Epp 4th Edition Section 4.4 ( link to video ) ( Link to Notes )
  • Epp 4th Edition Section 4.6: Indirect Argument: Contraposition and Contraposition
    • Exercises:
      • Exercises about rational and irrational numbers: Epp 4th Edition Section 4.6 # 2 and these Three Extra Questions:
        1. Suppose that \( q=a/b \) is a rational number. What does that tell you about \(a\) and \(b\)?
        2. Suppose that \( q=a/b \) is a rational number and \(q=0\). What does that tell you about \(a\) and \(b\)?
        3. Suppose that \( q=a/b \) is a rational number and \(q \neq 0\). What does that tell you about \(a\) and \(b\)?
      • Exercises to be proven directly, not using contradiction and not proving the contrapositive: Epp 4th Edition Section 4.6 # 4,5,6,7,17
      • Exercises to be proven indirectly, by proving the contrapositive: Epp 4th Edition Section 4.6 # 10,12,14,15,19,21,22,24,25,26,27,28
      • Exercises to be proven indirectly by contradiction: Epp 4th Edition Section 4.6 # 16
      • Remark: Observe that out of all of the exercises that I assign in this section, only one needs to be proven by contradiction!
    • Video: Video for Epp 5th Edition Section 4.7 = Topics from Epp 4th Edition Section 4.6 ( link to video )
    • Notes: Notes from Video for Epp 5th Edition Section 4.7 ( Link to Notes )
  • Epp 4th Edition Section 4.7: Indirect Argument: Two Classical Theorems
    • Exercises: Epp 4th Edition Section 4.7 # 1,2,4,8,11,12,14,15,17,21,22,31
    • Video: There is no video prepared for this section of the book.
  • Epp 4th Edition Section 4.8: The Euclidean Algorithm
    • Exercises: Epp 4th Edition Section 4.8 #13,14,15,16,25,26,27,28,29
    • Video: There is no video prepared for this section of the book.
  • Epp 4th Edition Section 5.1 Sequences
  • Epp 4th Edition Section 5.2 Mathematical Induction I
  • Epp 4th Edition Section 5.3 Mathematical Induction II
    • Homework: Epp 4th Edition 5.3 # 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17, 19, 23
    • Video: A video has not been prepared for Section 5.3
  • Epp 4th Edition Section 5.4 Strong Mathematical Induction
    • Homework: Epp 4th Edition 5.4 # 1, 4, 5, 9, 10, 13, 17, 18, 23, 24, 29, 30
    • Video: A video has not been prepared for Section 5.4
  • Epp 4th Edition Section 1.2 The Language of Sets
    • Homework: Epp 4th Edition1.2 # 11,12
    • Video: A video has not been prepared for Section 1.2
  • Epp 4th Edition Section 1.3 The Language of Relations and Functions
    • Homework: Epp 4th Edition1.3 # 1,3,5,6,7,9,10,12,13,15,19
    • Video: A video has not been prepared for Section 1.3
  • Epp 4th Edition Section 8.1 Relations on Sets
    • Homework: Epp 4th Edition 8.1 # 1,3,4,7,10,11,12,13,15,16,19,21,22
    • Video: ( video ) ( notes )
  • Epp 4th Edition Section 8.2 Reflexivity, Symmetry, and Transitivity
  • Epp 4th Edition Section 8.3 Equivalence Relations
  • Epp 4th Edition Section 8.4 Modular Arithmetic with Applications to Cryptography
    • Exercises: Epp 4th Edition Section 8.4 # 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, 12, 14, 15, 16, 19, 22, 26, 31, 33, 36, 39, 42
    • Video: A video has not been prepared for Section 8.4


Calendar:

Calendar for 2022 - 2023 Fall Semester MATH 3070/5070 Number Theory, taught by Mark Barsamian


Week 1 (Mon Aug 22 through Fri Aug 26)

Mon Aug 22:

  • Section to Discuss: 1.1 Variables
  • Homework: H01.1: 1.1#2,6,11,13

Tue Aug 24:

  • Section to Discuss: 2.1 Logical form and Logical Equivalence
  • Homework: H02.1: 2.1#8,22,26,28,33,34,42,45 ( video ) ( notes )

Fri Aug 26:

  • Section to Discuss: 2.2 Conditional Statements
  • Homework: H02.2: 2.2#8,15,{20b,22b,23b},21,33,35,41,43 ( video ) ( notes )
  • Class Presentations for Fri Aug 26
    • Gretchen Angst CP1: Which of these statements is true? Explain
      1. If the moon is made of green cheese, then our class meets in Morton Hall.
      2. If the moon is made of green cheese, then the world is flat.
    • Evan Brooks CP1: Use a truth table to prove that \(p \rightarrow q\) is logically equivalent to \( (\sim p) \vee q\).
    • Michael Cooney CP1:
      1. Given that \(p \rightarrow q \equiv (\sim p) \vee q\), use DeMorgan to find \( \sim (p \rightarrow q) \).
      2. Negate statement S: If the truck is a Ford then the motorcycle is a Honda.

Week 2 (Mon Aug 29 through Fri Sep 2)

Mon Aug 29:

  • Section to Discuss: 2.3 Valid and Invalid Arguments (Argument Forms)
  • Homework: H02.3: 2.3#9,15,23,29,31,32 ( video ) ( notes )
  • Quiz Q01 on Mon Aug 29 Covering Sections 2.1 and 2.2
    • 20 Minutes at the end of class
    • Similar to Suggested Exercises from Sections 2.1 and 2.2.

Wed Aug 31:

  • Section to Discuss: 3.1 Predicates and Quantified Statements I
  • Homework: Homework H03.1: 3.1#4,5,10,16,18,22,29 ( video ) ( notes )

Fri Sep 2:

  • Section to Discuss: 3.2 Predicates and Quantified Statements II
  • Homework: H03.2: 3.2#4,10,15,17,25,27,38,44 ( video ) ( notes )
  • Class Presentations for Fri Sep 2

    Julie Fausnaugh CP1:

    1. Let A be the statement
      "Every vehicle in the Morton Hall parking lot is a Ford".
      What is ~ A ?
    2. More generally, let A be the universal statement $$\forall x \in D \left( Q(x) \right)$$ What is ~ A ?

    Lucas Fernandes CP1:

    1. Let B be the statement
      "There exists a vehicle in the Morton Hall parking lot that is a Ferrari".
      What is ~ B ?
    2. More generally, let B be the existential statement $$\exists x \in D \left( Q(x) \right)$$ What is ~ B ?

    Luke Haskell CP1:

    1. Let C be the universal conditional statement $$\forall x \in D \left( IF \ \ P(x) \ \ THEN \ \ Q(x) \right)$$ What is the negation, ~ C ?
    2. As a specific example, let C be the following universal conditional statement: $$\forall x \in \mathbb{R} \left( x \lt 7 \rightarrow x^2 \lt 49\right)$$ Find the negation ~ C .
    3. For the specific example given, which is true, C or ~ C ? Explain.

    Ethan Levingston CP1: Consider again the universal conditional statement C that Luke discussed earlier: $$\forall x \in \mathbb{R} \left( x \lt 7 \rightarrow x^2 \lt 49\right)$$

    1. Write the converse, contrapositive, and inverse of C
    2. Consider the four statements:
      • original statement C
      • converse of C
      • contrapositve of C
      • inverse of C
      Which are true and which are false? Explain.

    Jennifer Lewis CP1: Let S be the following universal conditional statement: $$\forall n \in \mathbb{Z} \left(IF \ \frac{6}{n} \ is \ an \ integer, \ THEN \ \ n=2 \ or \ n=3\right)$$

    1. Write the converse, contrapositive, inverse, and negation of S
    2. Consider the five statments:
      • original statement S
      • converse of S
      • contrapositve of S
      • inverse of S
      • negation of S
      Which are true and which are false? Explain.


Week 3 (Mon Sep 5 through Fri Sep 9)

Mon Sep 5 is Labor Day Holiday: No Class

Wed Sep 7:

  • Section to Discuss: 3.3 Statements with Multiple Quantifiers
  • Homework: H03.3: 3.3#2,3,6,17,19,20,23,26,30,38 ( video ) ( notes )
  • Class Presentations for Wed Sep 7

    Daniel Lipec CP1: Changing the order of multiple quantifiers.

    Statement B is obtained by switching the order the quantifiers of Statement A . $$\text{Statement A: }\forall x \in \left( \exists y \in \mathbb{Z} \left(x+y=0\right) \right) $$ $$\text{Statement B: } \exists y \in \mathbb{Z} \left( \forall x \in \mathbb{Z} \left(x+y=0\right) \right) $$

    Answer these questions.

    1. Which of the statements are true ? (one or both ) Explain.
    2. One of the two statments is famous property of the Integers. Which statement? What is the name of the property? Explain.
    3. Find the negation of any of any of the statements that are false.

    Bradey LounsburyCP1: Changing the domain in quantifiers.

    Consider the following Statement S ..

    $$\text{Statement S: }\forall x \in D \left( \exists y \in D \left( xy=1 \right) \right) $$
    1. Write the negation for S .
    2. Is Statement S true when \(D = \mathbb{Z}\)? Explain.
    3. Is Statement S true when \(D = \mathbb{R}\) ? Explain.
    4. Is Statement S true when \(D = \mathbb{R}^+\) ? Explain.

    Bryce NicholsonCP1: Interchanging \( \forall \) and \( \exists \) in multiple quantifiers.

    Consider Statement A and Statement B , which is obtained by interchanging \( \forall \) and \( \exists \) in the quantifiers of Statement A .

    $$\text{Statement A: }\forall x \in \mathbb{Z} \left( \exists y \in \mathbb{Z} \left( x \lt y \right) \right) $$ $$\text{Statement B: }\exists x \in \mathbb{Z} \left( \forall y \in \mathbb{Z} \left( x \lt y \right) \right) $$

    Is either of these statements true ? Explain.


    Brittany Poss CP1: Interchanging x and y in the quantifiers.

    Consider Statement A and Statement B , which is obtained by interchanging x and y in the quantifiers of Statement A .

    $$\text{Statement A: }\forall x \in D \left( \exists y \in D \left( y=3x+2 \right) \right) $$ $$\text{Statement B: }\forall y \in D \left( \exists x \in D \left( y=3x+2 \right) \right) $$

    Answer the following questions.

    • Let the domain \(D\) be the set \(\mathbb{R}\). Is either of the statements A , B true ? Explain.
    • Let the domain \(D\) be the set \(\mathbb{Z}\). Is either of the statements A , B true ? Explain.

    Clair Schmidt CP1: Choosing correct order for symbols to create a true statement.

    You find thirteen cards scattered on the ground. They have the following symbols on them:

    $$\boxed{\mathbb{R}} \ \ \boxed{\mathbb{Z}^+} \ \ \boxed{x} \ \ \boxed{y} \ \ \boxed{y= \sqrt{x}} \ \ \boxed{\forall} \ \ \boxed{\exists} \ \ \boxed{\in} \ \ \boxed{\in} \ \ \boxed{(} \ \ \boxed{(} \ \ \boxed{)} \ \ \boxed{)}$$

    Assemble the cards in an order that makes a correct statement. Explain.


  • Quiz Q02 on Wed Sep 7 Covering Sections 2.3, 3.1, and 3.2
    • 20 Minutes at the end of class
    • Similar to Suggested Exercises from Sections 2.3 and 3.2.

Fri Sep 9:

  • Section to Discuss: 3.4 Arguments with Quantified Statements
  • Homework: H03.4: 3.4#4,11,13,15,17,18,20,22,26
  • Class Presentations: tba

Week 4 (Mon Sep 12 through Fri Sep 16)

Exam X1 on Mon Sep 12 Covering Chapters 1,2,3

  • The exam is the full class period.
  • No calculators, books, or notes
  • The Exam is typeset on 4 pages, printed on front & back of 2 sheets of paper. But page 4 is a table of Valid and Invalid Argument Forms, so the actual questions on the Exam occupy only 3 pages. This makes the Exam roughly 3 times the length of a Quiz.
  • The exam is six questions.
    1. A question involving DeMorgan's laws and/or the negation of a Conditional Statement. (Concepts from Section 2.1 and 2.2)
    2. A question involving DeMorgan's laws and/or the negation of a Conditional Statement. (Concepts from Section 2.1 and 2.2)
    3. A question about logical equivalence of statement forms. (Concepts from Section 2.2)
    4. A question about logical equivalence of statement forms. (Concepts from Section 2.2)
    5. A question about statements with multiple quantifiers, and negations of those statements. (Concepts from Section 3.3)
    6. A question about valid and invalid arguments. (Concepts from Section 3.4)(A table of Valid and Invalid Argument Forms will be provided.)

Wed Sep 14:

  • Section to Discuss: Epp 4th Edition Section 4.1 Direct Proof and Counterexample I: Introduction:
    • Exercises from Epp 4th Edition Section 4.1: # 4, 11, 16, 20, 22, 24, 25, 29, 31, 33, 35, 43, 44, 45, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 56, 57, 58
    • Video for Epp 5th Edition Section 4.1 = Epp 4th Edition Section 4.1: ( Video ) ( Notes )
    • Video for Epp 5th Edition Section 4.2 = more topics from Epp 4th Edition Section 4.1: ( Video ) ( Notes )
  • Class Presentations for Wed Sep 14
    • Jake Schneider CP1:
      1. Is 0 even ? Explain
      2. Can negative numbers be even ? Can they be odd ? Explain.
      3. Are even & odd opposites? That word, opposites , is not really a defined term in our course. A better question would be, are even & odd the negation of one another? That is, is every integer either even or odd? Explain.
      4. Assume that \(r\) and \(s\) are particular integers (a) is \(4rs\) even ? (b) is \(6r+4s^2+3\) odd? Explain.
    • Roman Simkins CP1: Prove or disprove: \(\forall n \in \mathbb{Z} \left(\text{If } n \text{ is odd then } \frac{n-1}{2} \text{ is odd.}\right) \)

Fri Sep 16:

  • Section to Discuss: Epp 4th Edition Section 4.1 Direct Proof and Counterexample I: Introduction:
    • Exercises from Epp 4th Edition Section 4.1: # 4, 11, 16, 20, 22, 24, 25, 29, 31, 33, 35, 43, 44, 45, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 56, 57, 58
    • Video for Epp 5th Edition Section 4.1 = Epp 4th Edition Section 4.1: ( Video ) ( Notes )
    • Video for Epp 5th Edition Section 4.2 = more topics from Epp 4th Edition Section 4.1: ( Video ) ( Notes )
  • Class Presentations for Fri Sep 16
    • Grace Smith CP1:
      1. Is 1 prime ? Explain.
      2. Can negative numbers be prime? Can they be composite? Explain.
      3. Are prime & composite opposites? That word, opposites , is not really a defined term in our course. A better question would be, are prime & composite the negation of one another? That is, is every integer either prime or composite? Explain.
      4. If \(r\) and \(s\) are positive integers, is \(r^2+2rs+s^2\) prime or composite or neither? Explain.
    • Rashid Al Busa'idi CP1: Prove or disprove the following statements.
      1. \(\exists n \in \mathbb{Z} \left(2n^2-5n+2 \text{ is prime.}\right) \)
      2. \(\forall n \in \mathbb{Z} \left(2n^2-5n+2 \text{ is composite.}\right) \)
      3. \(\forall n \in \mathbb{Z} \left(2n^2-5n+2 \text{ is prime OR } 2n^2-5n+2 \text{ is composite.}\right) \)
    • Nicole Strang CP1: Consider Statement \(S\): \(\forall n \in D\left(n^2-n+11 \text{ is prime.}\right) \)
      1. Let \(D=\{1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10\}\). Prove that \(S\) is true using the method of exhaustion .
      2. Now let \(D=\mathbb{Z}^+\). Is \(S\) true or false? Explain.


Week 5 (Mon Sep 19 through Fri Sep 23)

Mon Sep 19:

  • Section to Discuss: Epp 4th Edition Section 4.1 Direct Proof and Counterexample I: Introduction:
    • Exercises from Epp 4th Edition Section 4.1: # 4, 11, 16, 20, 22, 24, 25, 29, 31, 33, 35, 43, 44, 45, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 56, 57, 58
    • Video for Epp 5th Edition Section 4.1 = Epp 4th Edition Section 4.1: ( Video ) ( Notes )
    • Video for Epp 5th Edition Section 4.2 = more topics from Epp 4th Edition Section 4.1: ( Video ) ( Notes )
  • Class Presentations for Mon Sep 19:
      • Gretchen Angst CP2: (Exercise 4.1#43 from Epp 4th Edition) Prove or disprove: The product of any two odd integers is odd.
      • Evan Brooks CP2: (Exercise 4.1#45 from Epp 4th Edition) Prove or disprove: The difference of any two odd integers is odd.
      • Michael Cooney CP2: (Exercse 4.1#50 from Epp 4th Edition) Prove or disprove: For all integers \(m,n\) if \(m-n\) is even, then \(m^3-n^3\) is even.
      • Julie Fausnaugh CP2: (Exercse 4.1#51 from Epp 4th Edition) Prove or disprove: For all integers \(n\) if \(n\) is prime, then \((-1)^n=-1\).
      • Lucas Fernandes CP2: (Exercse 4.1#52 from Epp 4th Edition) Prove or disprove: For all integers \(m\) if \(m>2\), then \(m^2-4\) is composite .

Wed Sep 21:

  • Section to Discuss: Epp 4th Edition Section 4.2 Direct Proof and Counterexample II: Rational Numbers:
    • Exercises from Epp 4th Edition Section 4.2: # 2, 4, 6, 9, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 28, 31, 33
    • Video: Video for Epp 5th Edition Section 4.3 = Topics from Epp 4th Edition Section 4.2 ( link to video ) ( Link to Notes )
  • Class Presentations for Wed Sep 21

      • Luke Haskell CP2: The following statement about rational numbers is true . (It is the subject of Epp 4th Edition Exercise 4.2#15.)

        The product of any two rational numbers is a rational number.

        But the following statement irrational numbers is false .

        The product of any two irrational numbers is an irrational number.

        Prove that the statement about irrational numbers is false . (Give a counterexample.)

      • Ethan Levingston CP2: The following statement about rational numbers is true . (It is the subject of Epp 4th Edition Exercise 4.2#17.)

        The difference of any two rational numbers is a rational number.

        But the following statement irrational numbers is false .

        The difference of any two irrational numbers is an irrational number.

        Prove that the statement about irrational numbers is false . (Give a counterexample.)

      • Jennifer Lewis CP2: The following statement about rational numbers is true . (It is the subject of Epp 4th Edition Exercise 4.2#18.)

        If \(r\) and \(s\) are rational numbers, then \(\frac{r+s}{2}\) is a rational number .

        But the following statement irrational numbers is false .

        If \(r\) and \(s\) are irrational numbers, then \(\frac{r+s}{2}\) is an irrational number.

        Prove that the statement about irrational numbers is false . (Give a counterexample.)


  • Quiz Q03 on Wed Sep 21, covers Section 4.1

Fri Sep 23:

  • Section to Discuss: Epp 4th Edition Section 4.2 Direct Proof and Counterexample II: Rational Numbers:
    • Exercises from Epp 4th Edition Section 4.2: # 2, 4, 6, 9, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 28, 31, 33
    • Video: Video for Epp 5th Edition Section 4.3 = Topics from Epp 4th Edition Section 4.2 ( link to video ) ( Link to Notes )
  • Class Presentations for Fri Sep 23
    • Daniel Lipec CP02: Consider the list of expressions below. Which represent real numbers? Which represent rational numbers. Explain. (If you say that an expression represents a rational number, then you should give the ratio of integers that equals that expression.)
      1. 7
      2. -5
      3. 0
      4. 0/5
      5. 5/0
      6. 753.86234
      7. 753.86234234234� (Decimal repeats starting in the 3rd decimal place.)
    • Bradey Lounsbury CP02:
      1. What is the Zero Product Property ?
      2. Write the Zero Product Property as a universal conditional statement. Then write the contrapositive of that universal conditional statement.
      3. Why is the Zero Product Property introduced in Epp 4th Edition Section 4.2 on Rational Numbers? Give an example of how the Zero Product Property is used in Section 4.2.
    • Bryce Nicholson CP02: Consider the statement "The square of any rational number is rational"
      1. Rewrite the statement more clearly using quantifiers.
      2. Prove or disprove the statement.
    • Brittany Poss CP02: Consider the statement "The product of any two rational numbers is rational"
      1. Rewrite the statement more clearly using quantifiers.
      2. Prove or disprove the statement.
    • Clair Schmidt CP02: Consider the statement "The quotient of any two rational numbers is rational"
      1. Rewrite the statement more clearly using quantifiers.
      2. Prove or disprove the statement.



Week 6 (Mon Sep 26 through Fri Sep 30)

Mon Sep 26:

  • Section to Discuss: Epp 4th Edition Section 4.3 Direct Proof and Counterexample III: Divibility
    • Homework: Problems from Epp 4th Edition Section 4.3 # 2,3,4,12,15,16,19,20,24,26,27,28,29,30,32,36,37,38,41,47,48
    • Video: Video for Epp 5th Edition Section 4.4 = Topics from Epp 4th Edition Section 4.3 ( link to video ) ( Link to Notes )
  • Class Presentations for Mon Sep 26
    • Jake Schneider CP02:
      1. Do the symbols 5 / 7 and 5 | 7 mean the same thing ? Explain.
      2. Do the symbols 2 / 6 and 2 | 6 mean the same thing ? Explain.
      3. Frick and Frack are arguing. Frick says that 3 / 0 is undefined. Frack says that 3 | 0 is true. Who is right ? Explain.
      4. Donkey and Elephant are arguing. Donkey says that 0 / 5 is zero. Elephant says that 0 | 5 is false. Who is right ? Explain.
    • Roman Simkins CP02: Consider the statement "For all integers a , b , and c , if a | b and a | c , then a | b-c ."
      1. Write the statement formally, using symbols for the quantifier.
      2. Write the negation of the statement formally, using symbols for the quantifier.
      3. Prove or disprove the statement.
    • Grace Smith CP02: Consider the statement "For all integers a , b , and c , if ab | c then a | c and b | c."
      1. Write the statement formally, using symbols for the quantifier.
      2. Write the negation of the statement formally, using symbols for the quantifier.
      3. Prove or disprove the statement.
    • Nicole Strang CP02: Consider the statement "For all integers a , b , and c , if a | bc then a | b or a | c."
      1. Write the statement formally, using symbols for the quantifier.
      2. Write the negation of the statement formally, using symbols for the quantifier.
      3. Prove or disprove the statement.
    • Rashid Al Busa�idi CP02: Consider the statement "For all integers a , b , and c , if a | b then a 2 | b 2 ."
      1. Write the statement formally, using symbols for the quantifier.
      2. Write the negation of the statement formally, using symbols for the quantifier.
      3. Prove or disprove the statement.


Wed Sep 28:

  • Section to Discuss: Epp 4th Edition Section 4.3 Direct Proof and Counterexample III: Divibility
    • Homework: Problems from Epp 4th Edition Section 4.3 # 2,3,4,12,15,16,19,20,24,26,27,28,29,30,32,36,37,38,41,47,48
    • Video: Video for Epp 5th Edition Section 4.4 = Topics from Epp 4th Edition Section 4.3 ( link to video ) ( Link to Notes )
  • Class Presentations for Wed Sep 28
    • Gretchen Angst CP03:
      1. Suppose that a number \(a\) can be written in standard factored form $$a=p_1^{e_1}p_2^{e_2}\cdot\cdot\cdotp_k^{e_k}$$ where
        • \(k\) is a positive integer.
        • \(p_1,p_2, ...,p_k\) are prime numbers with \(p_1 \lt p_2 \lt ... \lt p_k\).
        • \(e_1,e_2, ...,e_k\) are positive integers.
        What is the standard factored form for \(a^3\)?
      2. Find the least positive integer such that $$2^4\cdot3^5\cdot7\cdot11^2\cdot k$$ is a perfect cube. Write the resulting product as a perfect cube.
    • Evan Brooks CP03: How many zeros are at the end of the number \(35^{113}\cdot 48^{23}\)? Explain how you can answer this question without actually computing the number. (Hint: \(10=2\cdot5\).)
    • Michael Cooney CP03: Prove that for any nonnegative integer \(n\), if the sum of the digits of \(n\) is divisible by \(9\), then \(n\) is divisible by \(9\). (Hint: Study Exercise 4.3#47 for a concrete example, and then generalize that example.)


  • Quiz Q04 on Wed Sep 28, Covers Epp 4th Edition Sections 4.2 and 4.3

Fri Sep 30 is Fall Break: No Class. Stay home and study math!!


Week 7 (Mon Oct 3 through Fri Oct 7)

Mon Oct 3:

  • Section to Discuss: Epp 4th Edition Section 4.4 Direct Proof and Counterexample V: Division into Cases and the Quotient Remainder Theorem:
    • Exercises from Epp 4th Edition Section 4.4 Direct Proof and Counterexample V:: # 1,3,5,7,10,13,14,17,20,23,25,27,28a,29,9036,37,38,39
    • Video: Video for Epp 5th Edition Section 4.5 = Topics from Epp 4th Edition Section 4.4 ( link to video ) ( Link to Notes )
  • Class Presentations for Mon Oct 3
    • Julie Fausnaugh CP3: (similar to Epp 4th Edition Section 4.4 Exercises #7,10)
      1. Find \(50\text{ div }7\) and \(50\text{ mod }7\). Show the corresponding \(n=dq+r\) equation.
      2. Find \(-50\text{ div }7\) and \(-50\text{ mod }7\). Show the corresponding \(n=dq+r\) equation.
      3. Find \(56\text{ div }7\) and \(56\text{ mod }7\). Show the corresponding \(n=dq+r\) equation.
    • Lucas Fernandes CP3: (similar to Epp 4th Edition Section 4.4 Exercise #20)
      If \(c\) is an integer such that \(c \text{ mod } 13 = 5\), then what is \(6c \text{ mod } 13\)?
      In other words, if division of \(c\) by 13 gives a remainder of \(5\), what is the remainder when \(6c\) is divided by \(13\)? Explain using \(n=dq+r\) equations.
    • Luke Haskell CP3: (similar to Epp 4th Edition Section 4.4 Exercise #23)
      Prove that for all integers \(a\) and \(b\), if \(a \text{ mod } 7 = 5\) and \(b \text{ mod } 7 = 6\), then \(ab \text{ mod } 7 = 2\).
      Hint: Prove using \(n=dq+r\) equations.


Wed Oct 5:

  • Section to Discuss: Epp 4th Edition Section 4.4 Direct Proof and Counterexample V: Division into Cases and the Quotient Remainder Theorem:
    • Exercises from Epp 4th Edition Section 4.4 Direct Proof and Counterexample V:: # 1,3,5,7,10,13,14,17,20,23,25,27,28a,29,9036,37,38,39
    • Video: Video for Epp 5th Edition Section 4.5 = Topics from Epp 4th Edition Section 4.4 ( link to video ) ( Link to Notes )
  • Class Presentations for Wed Oct 5
    • Ethan Levingston CP3: (similar to Epp 4th Edition Section 4.4 Exercise #29) Suppose that \(n\) is an integer.
      1. What does the Quotient Remainder Theorem with \(d=2\) tell us about \(n\)?
      2. What does the Quotient Remainder Theorem with \(d=3\) tell us about \(n\)?
      3. Use the Quotient Remainder Theorem with \(d=3\) to prove that the cube of any integer has the form \(3k\) or \(3k+1\) or \(3k+2\) for some integer \(k\).
    • Jennifer Lewis CP3: (similar to Epp 4th Edition Section 4.4 Exercise #30) Recall that two consecutive integers can always be written in the form \(n(n+1)\), where \(n\) is an integer.
      1. What does the Quotient Remainder Theorem with \(d=3\) tell us about \(n\)?
      2. Your result of (a) should give you three possible cases for \(n\). What are the resulting values of \(n(n+1)\) in those three cases?
      3. Use the Quotient Remainder Theorem with \(d=3\) to prove that the product of any two consecutive integers has the form \(3k\) or \(3k+2\) for some integer \(k\).


  • Quiz Q05 on Wed Oct 5 over \(n=dq+r\) and MOD and DIV from Epp 4th Edition Section 4.4.

Fri Oct 7:

  • Section to Discuss: Epp 4th Edition Section 4.6: Indirect Argument: Contraposition and Contraposition
    • Exercises:
      • Exercises about rational and irrational numbers: Epp 4th Edition Section 4.6 # 2 and these Three Extra Questions:
        1. Suppose that \( q=a/b \) is a rational number. What does that tell you about \(a\) and \(b\)?
        2. Suppose that \( q=a/b \) is a rational number and \(q=0\). What does that tell you about \(a\) and \(b\)?
        3. Suppose that \( q=a/b \) is a rational number and \(q \neq 0\). What does that tell you about \(a\) and \(b\)?
      • Exercises to be proven directly, not using contradiction and not proving the contrapositive: Epp 4th Edition Section 4.6 # 4,5,6,7,17
      • Exercises to be proven indirectly, by proving the contrapositive: Epp 4th Edition Section 4.6 # 10,12,14,15,19,21,22,24,25,26,27,28
      • Exercises to be proven indirectly by contradiction: Epp 4th Edition Section 4.6 # 16
      • Remark: Observe that out of all of the exercises that I assign in this section, only one needs to be proven by contradiction!
    • Video: Video for Epp 5th Edition Section 4.7 = Topics from Epp 4th Edition Section 4.6 ( link to video )
    • Notes: Notes from Video for Epp 5th Edition Section 4.7 ( Link to Notes )
    • Handouts: Handout on Overuse of the Method of Contradiction ( Link to Handout )
  • Class Presentations for Fri Oct 7

    Daniel Lipec CP3: Suppose that \(k\) is an integer.

    1. What does the Quotient Remainder Theorem (QRT) with \(d=3\) tell you about \(k\)?
    2. What does the remainder \(r\) have to be if the unknown \(k\) is going to be divisible by \(3\)?
    3. Suppose that it is known that \(k=3m+2\) for some integer \(m\). Is \(k\) divisible by \(3\)?

    Bradey Lounsbury CP3: Let \(S\) be the statement $$\forall m\in \mathbb{Z} \left( \exists n \in \mathbb{Z} \left( n \gt n \right) \right)$$

    1. Prove \(S\).
    2. Find the negation of \(S\).
    3. Is the negation of \(S\) true or false? Explain.

    Bryce Nicholson CP3: Let \(S\) be the statement $$\forall x \in \mathbb{R} \left( \text{ If }\sqrt{x} \in \mathbb{Q} \text{ then }x\in \mathbb{Q} \right)$$

    1. Prove \(S\).
    2. Find the contrapositive of \(S\).
    3. Is the contrapositive of \(S\) true or false? Explain.



Week 8 (Mon Oct 10 through Fri Oct 14)

Bonus Quiz BQ1 due at the start of class on Mon Oct 10. ( Link to Bonus Quiz ) If you do not have a printout of this quiz, then you must find a way to print one. I will not accept hand-written solutions that are not on a printed quiz.

Mon Oct 10:

  • Section to Discuss: Epp 4th Edition Section 4.6: Indirect Argument: Contraposition and Contraposition
    • Exercises:
      • Exercises about rational and irrational numbers: Epp 4th Edition Section 4.6 # 2 and these Three Extra Questions:
        1. Suppose that \( q=a/b \) is a rational number. What does that tell you about \(a\) and \(b\)?
        2. Suppose that \( q=a/b \) is a rational number and \(q=0\). What does that tell you about \(a\) and \(b\)?
        3. Suppose that \( q=a/b \) is a rational number and \(q \neq 0\). What does that tell you about \(a\) and \(b\)?
      • Exercises to be proven directly, not using contradiction and not proving the contrapositive: Epp 4th Edition Section 4.6 # 4,5,6,7,17
      • Exercises to be proven indirectly, by proving the contrapositive: Epp 4th Edition Section 4.6 # 10,12,14,15,19,21,22,24,25,26,27,28
      • Exercises to be proven indirectly by contradiction: Epp 4th Edition Section 4.6 # 16
      • Remark: Observe that out of all of the exercises that I assign in this section, only one needs to be proven by contradiction!
    • Video: Video for Epp 5th Edition Section 4.7 = Topics from Epp 4th Edition Section 4.6 ( link to video )
    • Notes: Notes from Video for Epp 5th Edition Section 4.7 ( Link to Notes )
    • Handout: Handout on Overuse of the Method of Contradiction ( Link to Handout )
  • Class Presentations for Mon Oct 10

    Brittany Poss CP3: The goal is to prove the following Statement A :

    For all \(n\in \mathbb{Z}\), if \(n^2\) is odd then \(n\) is odd.
    1. Write the contrapositive of Statement A .
    2. Prove the contrapositive.

    Clair Schmidt CP3: The goal is to prove the following Statement B :

    For all real numbers \(a,b,r\) such that \(a,b \in \mathbb{Q}\) and \(b\neq0\), if \(r\) is irrational, then \(a+br\) is irrational.
    1. Write the contrapositive of Statement B .
    2. Prove the contrapositive.

    Jake Schneider CP3: The goal is to prove the following Statement C : $$\forall a,b,c \in \mathbb{Z} \left( \text{If } a \nmid bc \text{ then } a \nmid b \right)$$ (Note that the symbol \( \nmid\) means does not divide .)

    1. Write the contrapositive of Statement C .
    2. Prove the contrapositive.



Wed Oct 12:

  • Section to Discuss: Epp 4th Edition Section 4.7: Indirect Argument: Two Classical Theorems
    • Exercises: Epp 4th Edition Section 4.7 # 1,2,4,8,11,12,14,15,17,21,22,31
    • Video: There is no video prepared for this section of the book.
    • Handouts: Handout on Overuse of the Method of Contradiction ( Link to Handout )
  • Class Presentations for Wed Oct 12

    Nicole Strang CP3: Find the negation of Statement S : $$\text{Statement }S: \forall n \in \mathbb{Z}, p\in Primes \left(\text{If }p \mid n\text{ then }p \nmid (n+1) \right)$$ (Note that the symbol \( \mid\) means divides and the symbol \( \nmid\) means does not divide .)




Take-HomeQuiz Q06: Handed out on Wed Oct 12, Due Fri Oct 14, covering Epp 4th Edition Section 4.6, based on one of the exercises in the list

4.6#10,12,15,19,21,22,24,25,26,27,28.
(These problems have various instructions in the book. For many of them, the book says to prove the statement using contradiction . But these problems are taken from your suggested exercises for Section 4.6, and my instructions for all of them are to prove the contrapositive , and not use contradiction .)

Fri Oct 14:

  • Sections to Discuss:
    • Epp 4th Edition Section 4.7: Indirect Argument: Two Classical Theorems
      • Exercises: Epp 4th Edition Section 4.7 # 1,2,4,8,11,12,14,15,17,21,22,31
      • Video: There is no video prepared for this section of the book.
      • Handouts:
    • Epp 4th Edition Section 4.8: The Euclidean Algorithm
      • Exercises: Epp 4th Edition Section 4.8 #13,14,15,16,25,26,27,28,29
      • Video: There is no video prepared for this section of the book.
  • Class Presentations for Fri Oct 14

    Rashid Al Busa'idi CP3:

    1. Find the negation of this statement: $$ \forall p\in B \left(\forall x,y,z \in \mathbb{Z}\left(x^p+y^p\neq z^p \right) \right)$$
    2. Find the negation of this statement: $$ \forall n\in C \left(\forall x,y,z \in \mathbb{Z}\left(x^n+y^n\neq z^n \right) \right)$$
    3. Find the contrapositive of this statement: $$\text{If }\left( \forall p\in B \left(\forall x,y,z \in \mathbb{Z}\left(x^p+y^p\neq z^p \right) \right) \right)\text{ then } \left( \forall n\in C \left(\forall x,y,z \in \mathbb{Z}\left(x^n+y^n\neq z^n \right) \right) \right)$$

    Gretchen Angst CP4: (based on Epp 4th Edition Exercise 4.8#15) The goal is to find the greatest common divisor of \(832\) and \(10933\) two ways

    1. Show how to use Wolfram Alpha. (Project onto the screen.)
    2. Show the steps using the Euclidean algorithm (see Epp 4th Edition pages 222-224)

    Evan Brooks CP4: (related to Epp 4th Edition Exercise 4.8#15) The goal is to find the greatest common divisor of \(832\) and \(10933\) in a different way, using the prime factorizations .

    1. Show the prime factorizations of \(832\) and \(10933\)
    2. Using those prime factorizations to explain what the greatest common divisor of those two numbers is.

    Michael Cooney CP4: (related to Epp 4th Edition Exercise 4.8#25) The goal is to find the least common multiple of \(832 \)and \(10933\) using the prime factorizations .

    1. Show the prime factorizations of \(832\) and \(10933\)
    2. Using those prime factorizations to explain what the least common multiple of those two numbers is.




Week 9 (Mon Oct 17 through Fri Oct 21)

Mon Oct 17:

  • Section to Discuss: Epp 4th Edition Section 4.8: The Euclidean Algorithm
    • Exercises: Epp 4th Edition Section 4.8 #13,14,15,16,25,26,27,28,29
    • Video: There is no video prepared for this section of the book.
  • Class Presentations for Mon Oct 17

    Julie Fausnaugh CP4: (Your topic will be part of Monday�s discussion of greatest common divisor and least common multiple , but your topic is background, not related to anything discussed in the book.)
    Prove that if \(j\) and \(k\) are any two integers, then \(max\{j,k\}+min\{j,k\}=j+k\).
    (Hint: Notice that there is an OR statement that can be articulated: $$j \lt k \ \text{ OR } \ j = k \ \text{ OR } \ j \gt k$$ Exploit that to set up a proof by cases.)


    The next two presentations will be part of the review portion of the class meeting, reviewing concepts from Epp 4th Edition Section 4.4.

    To review the Quotient Remainder Theorem

    • Read Epp 4th Edition Section 4.4 Direct Proof and Counterexample V: Division into Cases and the Quotient Remainder Theorem.
    • Watch the Video for Epp 5th Edition Section 4.5 = Topics from Epp 4th Edition Section 4.4 ( link to video )
    • Read and the accompanying notes ( Link to Notes ).

    Lucas Fernandes CP4: (See note above about reviewing the Quotient Remainder Theorem .) Let \(n\) be an integer. What does the Quotient Remainder Theorem with \(d=4\) say about \(n\)?

    Luke Haskell CP4: (See note above about reviewing the Quotient Remainder Theorem .) Solve Epp 4th Edition exercise 4.4#36: Prove that the product of any four consecutive integers is diviible by 8. (Hint: Let your four consecutive integers be \(n,n+1,n+2,n+3\). Then use the Quotient Remainder Theorem with \(d=4\) to get four possibilities for \(n\).




Exam X2 on Wed Oct 19 Covering Chapter 4

  • The exam is the full class period.
  • No calculators, books, or notes
  • The Exam is typeset on 6 pages, printed on front & back of 3 sheets of paper.
  • The exam is six questions, 30 points each
    1. (Easy) Given a repeating decimal, write it as a ratio of integers (read 4th Edition Section 4.2, watch Video for 5th Edition Section 4.3)
    2. (Easy) Compute the Unique prime factorizations, GCD & LCM of two numbers (read 4th Edition Section 4.3, watch Video for 5th Edition Section 4.4)(read 4th Edition Section 4.8, which has no video)
    3. (Moderate) Disprove a statement about composite & prime numbers (read 4th Edition Section 4.1, watch Video for 5th Edition Section 4.1,4.2)
    4. (Moderate) Prove a statement about Divisibility (read 4th Edition Section 4.3, watch Video for 5th Edition Section 4.4)
    5. (Moderate) A proof involving the Quotient-Remainder Theorem (read 4th Edition Section 4.4, watch Video for 5th Edition Section 4.5)
    6. (Moderate) Prove a universal conditional statement by proving its contrapositive (read 4th Edition Section 4.6, watch Video for 5th Edition Section


Fri Oct 21:

  • Section to Discuss: Epp 4th Edition Section 5.1 Sequences
  • Class Presentations for Fri Oct 19

    Ethan Levingston CP4: (Watch VideoH05.1a , study [Example 2] on page 7 of the notes for VideoH05.1a , and read Epp 4th Edition page 229 Example 5.1.3)

    For the sequence that begins

    $$-1,3,-9,27,-81,...$$
    1. Find an explicit formula of the form \(a_0,a_1,a_2,...\)
    2. Find an explicit formula of the form \(b_1,b_2,b_3...\)

    Jennifer Lewis CP4: (Watch VideoH05.1a , study [Examples 5,6] on pages 13-14 of the notes for VideoH05.1a , and read Epp 4th Edition page 231 Example 5.1.7)

    For the sum

    $$\frac{1}{1\cdot2}+\frac{1}{2\cdot3}+...+\frac{1}{n\cdot(n+1)}$$
    1. Abbreviate the sum using summation notation .
    2. Find the value of the sum when \(n=1\).

    Daniel Lipec CP4: (Watch VideoH05.1a , study [Example 4 on pages 12 of the notes for VideoH05.1a , and read Epp 4th Edition page 232 Example 5.1.10)

    For the sum

    $$\sum_{n=1}^{99}\left(\frac{1}{n}-\frac{1}{n+1}\right)$$
    1. Write the sum in expanded form (but still abbreviated using ellipses . That is, use dot dot dot notation, �...�.)
    2. Find the value of the sum.

    Bradey Lounsbury CP4: (Watch VideoH05.1a and read Epp 4th Edition page 232 Example 5.1.9)

    For the sum $$\sum_{k=1}^{m+1}k^3$$ Rewrite the sum by separating off the final term.





Week 10 (Mon Oct 24 through Fri Oct 28)

Mon Oct 24

  • Section to Discuss: Epp 4th Edition Section 5.1 Sequences
  • Homework: Epp 4th Edition 5.1#2, 4, 10, 11, 13, 15, 16, 20, 21, 22, 26, 27, 30, 31, 33, 35, 38, 40, 44, 45, 46, 49, 53, 55, 62, 64, 65, 67
  • Videos:
  • Class Presentations for Mon Oct 24

    Bryce Nicholson CP4: (Read Epp Section 5.1, watch VideoH05.1a , and study [Examples 9,10] on page 17 of the notes for VideoH05.1a .)

    Expanded form often looks more intimidating than product notation, but it sometimes makes things more complicated. Consider this telescoping product, presented in expanded form:

    $$\text{Original product }=\left(\frac{1}{1+1}\right)\left(\frac{2}{2+1}\right)\left(\frac{3}{3+1}\right)\dotsm\left(\frac{k}{k+1}\right)$$
    1. Find the value of the product when \(k=2\).
    2. Express the Original Product in product notation.
    3. Express the product from (a) in product notation.

    Brittany Poss CP4: (Read Epp Section 5.1, watch VideoH05.1a , and study [Examples 9,10] on page 17 of the notes for VideoH05.1a .)

    1. Find the value of this telescoping product.
    2. $$\left(1-\frac{1}{2}\right)\left(1-\frac{1}{3}\right)\left(1-\frac{1}{3}\right)\dotsm\left(1-\frac{1}{1000}\right)$$
    3. Write the product from (a) in product notation.
    4. What do you think would be the value of this telescoping product? Explain.
    5. $$\left(1-\frac{1}{2}\right)\left(1-\frac{1}{3}\right)\left(1-\frac{1}{3}\right)\dotsm\left(1-\frac{1}{n}\right)$$
    6. Write the product from (c) in product notation.

    Clair Schmidt CP4: (Read Epp Section 5.1, watch VideoH05.1b and study [Example 1] on page 7 of the Notes from VideoH05.1b .)

    1. Show how \(\frac{6!}{4!}\) is found by cancelling factors.
    2. Show how \(\frac{6!}{1!}\) is found by cancelling factors.
    3. Show how \(\frac{6!}{0!}\) is found by cancelling factors.
    4. Show how \(\frac{n!}{(n-3)!}\) is found by cancelling factors (assume that \(3 \leq n\).)
    5. Show how \(\frac{n!}{(n-p+3)!}\) is found by cancelling factors (assume that \(3 \leq p \leq n+3\).)

    Jake Schneider CP4: (Read Epp Section 5.1, watch VideoH05.1b and study [Example 9] on page 9 of the Notes from VideoH05.1b .)

    1. Show how \(\left( \begin{eqnarray} 7 \\ 4 \end{eqnarray} \right) \) is found by cancelling factors.
    2. Show how \(\left( \begin{eqnarray} 5 \\ 1 \end{eqnarray} \right) \) is found by cancelling factors.
    3. Show how \(\left( \begin{eqnarray} 5 \\ 5 \end{eqnarray} \right) \) is found by cancelling factors.
    4. Show how \(\left( \begin{eqnarray} &n& \\ n&-&1 \end{eqnarray} \right) \) is found by cancelling factors (assume that \(1 \leq n\).)
    5. Show how \(\left( \begin{eqnarray} n+1 \\ n-1 \end{eqnarray} \right) \) is found by cancelling factors (assume that \(1 \leq n\).)



Wed Oct 26

  • Section to Discuss: Section 5.2 Mathematical Induction I
  • Homework: Epp 4th Edition 5.2 # 1, 2, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 20, 22, 25, 28
  • Video: ( VideoH05.2 ) ( Notes from VideoH05.2 )

Quiz Q07 on Wed Oct 26, covers Section 5.1

Fri Oct 28

  • Section to Discuss: Section 5.2 Mathematical Induction I
  • Homework: Epp 4th Edition 5.2 # 1, 2, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 20, 22, 25, 28
  • Video: ( VideoH05.2 ) ( Notes from VideoH05.2 )
  • Class Presentations for Fri Oct 28

    Roman Simkins CP3: (To prepare, read Epp 4th Edition Section 5.2, watch VideoH05.2 and read the Notes from VideoH05.2 . Pay particular attention to [Examples 9,10], beginning on page 17 .)

    Suppose that the goal is use the Method of Proof by Induction to prove the following statement: $$\forall n\in \mathbb{Z},n\geq1 \left(1+6+11+16+\dotsm +(5n-4)=\frac{n(5n-3)}{2}\right)$$ Your job is to do the preliminary work :

    1. What is the predicate , \(P(n)\)?
    2. What is the number playing the role of \(a\)?
    3. Write the expression for \(P(a)\).
    4. Write the expression for \(P(k)\).
    5. Write the expression for \(P(k+1)\).
    Note: Don�t do the proof! Just do the preliminary work .

    Grace Smith CP3: (To prepare, read Epp 4th Edition Section 5.2, watch VideoH05.2 and read the Notes from VideoH05.2 . Pay particular attention to [Examples 9,10], beginning on page 17 .)

    Suppose that the goal is use the Method of Proof by Induction to prove the following statement: $$\forall n\in \mathbb{Z},n\geq1 \left(1^3+2^3+3^3+\dotsm+n^3=\left[\frac{n(n+1)}{2}\right]^2\right)$$ Your job is to do the preliminary work :

    1. What is the predicate , \(P(n)\)?
    2. What is the number playing the role of \(a\)?
    3. Write the expression for \(P(a)\).
    4. Write the expression for \(P(k)\).
    5. Write the expression for \(P(k+1)\).
    Note: Don�t do the proof! Just do the preliminary work .



Week 11 (Mon Oct 31 through Fri Nov 4)

Mon Oct 31

Leftovers from Section 5.2 Mathematical Induction I

Problems about Coins and Stamps

  • Epp 4th Edition Proposition 5.2.1 (on page 247) For all integers \(n\geq8\), \(n\) cents can be obtained using \(3\) cent and \(5\) cent coins. (A detailed proof of the proposition provided in book.) On one hand, this is a simpler example because it does not involve complicated formulas. On the other hand is a difficult example because it involves both induction and proof by cases.
  • Homework problem Epp 4th Edition 5.2#1: Use mathematical induction (and the proof of Proposition 5.2.1 as a model) to show that any amount of money of at least \(14\) cents can be made up using\( 3 cent and \(8\) cent coins. (A detailed solution provided in the back of the book.)
  • Homework problem Epp 4th Edition 5.2#2: Use mathematical induction to show that any postage of at least \(1\)2 cents can be obtained using \(3\) cent and \(7\) cent stamps.

I won�t discuss this kind of problem in class: there is excellent coverage in the book, and I want you to learn this by reading the book. I will put a problem like this on the exam. So

  • Study the proposition.
  • Work Problem 5.2#1, using the proof of the proposition as your guide. Compare your solution to the book�s solution.
  • Work Problem 5.2#2, using the proof of the proposition and your own proof of 5.2#1 as a guide.

Geometric Sequences

Geometric Sums


Section 5.3 Mathematical Induction II

  • Homework: Epp 4th Edition 5.3 # 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17, 19, 23
  • Video: A video has not been prepared for Section 5.3
  • Handouts: Handout on Induction

Problems about Divisibility


Wed Nov 3 Discussed More Examples Involving Induction, had Quiz Q08

Wed Nov 2

  • Section to Discuss: Section 5.3 Mathematical Induction II
  • Homework: Epp 4th Edition 5.3 # 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17, 19, 23
  • Video: A video has not been prepared for Section 5.3

Quiz Q08 on Wed Nov 4, covers Section 5.2

Fri Nov 4

  • Section to Discuss: Section 5.4 Strong Mathematical Induction
  • Homework: Epp 4th Edition 5.4 # 1, 4, 5, 9, 10, 13, 17, 18, 23, 24, 29, 30
  • Video: A video has not been prepared for Section 5.4
  • Handouts: Handout on Induction

Week 12 (Mon Nov 7 through Fri Nov 11)

Exam X3 on Mon Nov 7 Covers Sections 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4

Wed Nov 9

Sections to Discuss:

  • Epp 4th Edition Section 1.2 The Language of Sets (No Video) (#11,12)
  • Epp 4th Edition Section 1.3 The Language of Relations and Functions (No Video) (#1,3,5,6,7,9,10,12,13,15,19)
  • Epp 4th Edition Section 8.1 Relations on Sets
    • Homework: Epp 4th Edition 8.1 # 1,3,4,7,10,11,12,13,15,16,19,21,22
    • Video: ( video ) ( notes )

Fri Nov 11 is Veterans Day Holiday: No Class


Week 13 (Mon Nov 14 through Fri Nov 18)

Mon Nov 14


Monday Nov 14 Meeting Topics

Sections to Discuss:

  • Epp 4th Edition Section 8.1 Relations on Sets
  • Epp 4th Edition Section 8.2 Reflexivity, Symmetry, and Transitivity
  • Epp 4th Edition Section 8.3 Equivalence Relations

In Epp 4th Edition Section 1.3 and Section 8.1, and in class on Wed Nov 9, you saw that the words \(S\) is a relation on the set of real numbers means simply that \(S\) is a subset of \(\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{R}\). That is, \(S\) is simply some set of ordered pairs of real numbers. And you saw that the symbol \( _xS_y\) is is spoken \(x\) is related to \(y\), and it means that the ordered pair \((x,y)\) is an element of the set \(S\). To define an actual relation, it must be specified what it actually means to say \( _xS_y\) That is, it must be specified what it actually means to say \(x\) is related to \(y\).

For example one could say that \( _xS_y\) means \(y=5x+3\). Then observe that the ordered pair \((x,y)=(1,8)\) is an element of \(S\), because the equation \(8 = 5(1) +3\) is true . We would say that \(1\) is related to \(8\). This could be abbreviated \( _1S_8\). But the ordered pair \((x,y)=(8,1)\) is not an element of \(S\), because the equation \(1 = 5(8) +3\) is not true. We would say that \(1\) is not related to \(8\).

Relations on the set of real numbers can be visualized, because they are subsets of the cartesian plane \(\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{R}\). A graph of a relation \(S\) on the set of real numbers is simply a picture of all of the elements of the set \(S\). In the case of the relation \(S\) introduced above, the graph of \(S\) is just a picture of all of the ordered pairs \((x,y)\) that satisfy the equation \(y=5x+3\). In other words, the graph of \(S\) is just a line with slope \(m=5\) and \(y\) intercept at \((x,y)=(0,1)\).

Eight students will each be given descriptions of relations on the set of real numbers. That means, they will be given a specification of what it actually means to say x is related to y . Their job is to draw a graph of the relation. ( Graph the relation on the chalkboard at the start of class.)

  • Nikki Strang CP4: \( _xS_y\) means \(y=x^2\).
  • Rashid Al Busa�idi CP4: \( _xS_y\) means \(x=y^2\).
  • Gretchen Angst CP5: \( _xS_y\) means \(x^2=y^2\).
  • Evan Brooks CP5: \( _xS_y\) means \(x \lt y\).
  • Michael Cooney CP5: \( _xS_y\) means \(x \leq y\).
  • Julie Fausnaugh CP5: \( _xS_y\) means \(xy=0\).
  • Luke Haskell CP5: \( _xS_y\) means \(xy\neq0\).
  • Ethan Levingston CP5: \( _xS_y\) means \(x=(y+\text{ some multiple of }10)\).

Then we�ll discuss Properties that Relations on a Set May or May Not Have: Reflexivity, Symmetry, Transitivity .

Then we�ll work on these two Worksheets on Properties of Relations .


Wed Nov 16

  • Section to Discuss: Epp 4th Edition Section 8.2 Reflexivity, Symmetry, and Transitivity
  • Exercises: Epp 4th Edition 8.2 # 4,5,7,8,9,10,11,13,14,15,16,30,32,33
  • Video: ( VideoH08.2 ) ( Notes from VideoH08.2 )
We worked more on the two Worksheets on Properties of Relations that were distributed on Monday.

Fri Nov 18

  • Section to Discuss: Epp 4th Edition Section 8.3 Equivalence Relations
  • Exercises: Epp 4th Edition 8.3 # 3,5,7,15,16a,20,21,28,29,32,42
  • Video: ( VideoH08.3 ) ( Notes from VideoH08.3 )

Quiz Q09 on Nov 18 Covers Sections 8.1, 8.2


Week 14 (Mon Nov 21 through Fri Nov 25)

Mon Nov 21


Sections to Discuss:

  • Epp 4th Edition Section 8.3 Equivalence Relations
  • Epp 4th Edition Section 8.4 Modular Arithmetic with Applications to Cryptography
    • Exercises: Epp 4th Edition Section 8.4 # 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, 12, 14, 15, 16, 19, 22, 26, 31, 33, 36, 39, 42
    • Video: A video has not been prepared for Section 8.4

Class Presentations

The presentations for today deal with the relation \(F\) that is the congruence modulo \(5\) relation on the set \(\mathbb{Z}\) , defined as follows:

For \(m,n \in \mathbb{Z}\), the symbol \(\ _mF_n\) means \(5|(m-n)\).

The presentations are taken from Suggested Exercise Epp 4th Edition 8.2#13. To study for these presentations, Study Epp 4th Edition Example 8.2.4 on page 455-456.

Nicole Strang CP5: Prove that \(F\) is reflexive .

Rashid Al Busa'idi CP5: Prove that \(F\) is symmetric .

Mark B will prove that \(F\) is transitive .




Wed and Fri Nov 23 and 25 are Thanksgiving Break


Week 15 (Mon Nov 30 through Fri Dec 4)

Mon Nov 28


Sections to Discuss:

  • Epp 4th Edition Section 8.3 Equivalence Relations
  • Epp 4th Edition Section 8.4 Modular Arithmetic with Applications to Cryptography
    • Exercises: 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, 12, 14, 15, 16, 19, 22, 26, 31, 33, 36, 39, 42
    • Video: A video has not been prepared for Section 8.4

Meeting Part 1: Properties of Congruence Modulo \(n\)

Last Monday, Nov 28, we discussed the relation \(F\) that is the congruence modulo \(5\) relation on the set \(\mathbb{Z}\) , defined as follows:

For \(m,n \in \mathbb{Z}\), the symbol \(\ _mF_n\) means \(5|(m-n)\).

On that Monday, we saw (in Class Presentations) that this relation is reflexive , symmetric , and transitive . Because the relation has all three of those properties, we say that it is an equivalence relation .

In Epp 4th Edition Section 8.3, you learned about equivalence classes for an equivalence relation .

Class Presentation: Roman Simkins CP4: Describe the distinct equivalence classes of relation \(F\) introduced above. ( Hint: This presentation is similar to Suggested Exercise Epp 4th Edition 8.3#21. To study for this presentation, read about equivalence classes in Epp 4th Edition Section 8.3. In particular, study Example 8.3.10 on pages 471-472.)

Mark B will talk a bit about properties of equivalence classes (Concepts from Section 8.3).

Mark B will talk a bit about modular equivalence , and various notation related to it.

Class Presentation: Grace Smith CP4: Which of these are true and which are false? Explain. ( Hint: The notation \(m \equiv n \mod d\) is Defined on Epp 4th Edition p.473. The next presentation is about that notation. It is similar to Suggested Exercise Epp 4th Edition 8.3#15. To study for this presentation, Study Epp 4th Edition Example 8.3.11 on p. 473.)(Justify your answers using \(n=dq+r\) equations.)

  1. \(-3 \equiv 3 \ (\text{mod }5)\)
  2. \(-3 \equiv -13 \ (\text{mod }5)\)
  3. \(42 \equiv 14 \ (\text{mod }7)\)
  4. \(42 \equiv 7 \ (\text{mod }14)\)

Mark B will brieflly discuss the terminology of residues .

Mark B will briefly discuss Theorem 8.4.2 Congruence Modulo \(n\) Is an Equivalence Relation .


Meeting Part 2: Modular Arithmetic

Mark B will briefly discuss Theorem 8.4.3 and Corollary 8.4.4 about Modular Arithmetic .

Six Class Presentations Presenting a Solution to Epp 4th Edition Section 8.4 Exercise #8 ( Hint: This exercise is just like Suggested Exercise #7 and Example 8.4.2 . (Justify your answers using \(n=dq+r\) equations.))

  1. Lucas Fernandes CP5: Verify that \(45 \equiv 3 \ (\text{mod }6)\) and that \(104 \equiv 2 \ (\text{mod }6)\).
  2. Jennifer LewisCP5: Verify that \((45+104) \equiv (3+2) \ (\text{mod }6)\).
  3. Daniel Lipec CP5: Verify that \((45 \cdot 104) \equiv (3 \cdot 2) \ (\text{mod }6)\).
  4. Bradey Lounsbury CP5: Verify that \(45^2 \equiv 3^2 \ (\text{mod }6)\).

Bryce Nicholson CP5: ( Hint: This exercise is just like Suggested Exercise Epp 4th Edition Section 8.4 #14 . Use the technique of Epp 4th Edition Section 8.4 Example 8.4.4 .) (Justify your answers using \(n=dq+r\) equations.)
Find the following quantities:

  • \(13 \ (\text{mod }54)\)
  • \(13^2 \ (\text{mod }54)\)
  • \(13^4 \ (\text{mod }54)\)
  • \(13^8 \ (\text{mod }54)\)
  • \(13^{16} \ (\text{mod }54)\)

Mark B will use Bryce�s results to find \(13^{22} \ (\text{mod }54)\). (This problem is similar to Suggested Exercise Epp 4th Edition Section 8.4 #15 , using the technique illustrated in Example 8.4.5 .)


Meeting Part 3 (On Monday, if we get to it. Otherwise on Wednesday): Extending the Euclidean Algorithm

Mark B will briefly discuss Theorem 8.4.5 .

Group Activity: Expressing a Greatest Common Divisor as a Linear Combination: Mimicking the steps of Example 8.4.7, Show that \(154\) and \(135\) are relatively prime , and find a linear combination of \(154\) and \(135\) that equals \(1\).

Group Activity 1: Expressing a Greatest Common Divisor as a Linear Combination: Mimicking the steps of Example 8.4.6,

  1. Find \(\text{gcd}(105,385)\)
  2. Find a linear combination of \(105\) and \(385\) that equals \(\text{gcd}(105,385)\).

Group Activity 2: Expressing a Greatest Common Divisor as a Linear Combination: Mimicking the steps of Example 8.4.7,

  1. Show that \(154\) and \(135\) are relatively prime
  2. Find a linear combination of \(154\) and \(135\) that equals \(1\).
  3. Find the multiplicative inverse of \(154\) modulo \(135\) .
  4. Find the multiplicative inverse of \(135\) modulo \(154\) .




Wed Nov 30


Sections to Discuss:

Epp 4th Edition Section 8.4 Modular Arithmetic with Applications to Cryptography

  • Exercises: 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, 12, 14, 15, 16, 19, 22, 26, 31, 33, 36, 39, 42
  • Video: A video has not been prepared for Section 8.4

Meeting Part 1: Extending the Euclidean Algorithm


Mark B will briefly discuss Lemma 4.8.2 .

If \(a\) and \(b\) are any integers not both zero, andif \(q\) and \(r\) are any integers such that $$a=bq+r$$ then $$\text{gcd}(a,b)=\text{gcd}(b,r)$$


Mark B will briefly discuss the terminology of linear combination of integers


Mark B will briefly discuss Theorem 8.4.5 . For all integers \(a\) and \(b\), not both zero, if \(d=\text{gcd}(a,b)\), then there exist integers \(s\) and \(t\) such that \(as+bt=d\). That is, the greatest common divisor of \(a\) and \(b\) can be written as a linear combination of \(a\) and \(b\).


Clair Schmidt Presentation CP5: Expressing a Greatest Common Divisor as a Linear Combination: Mimicking the steps of Example 8.4.6,

  1. Find \(\text{gcd}(105,385)\)
  2. Find a linear combination of \(105\) and \(385\) that equals \(\text{gcd}(105,385)\).

Mark B will briefly discuss relatively prime integers and Corollary 8.4.6 and Corollary 8.4.7 .


Brittany Poss Presentation CP5: Expressing 1 as a linear combination of relatively prime integers and Finding a Multiplicative Inverse Modulo \(n\): Mimicking the steps of Example 8.4.7 and Example 8.4.8

  1. Show that \(77\) and \(15\) are relatively prime
  2. Find a linear combination of \(77\) and \(15\) that equals \(1\).
  3. Find a multiplicative inverse of \(77\) modulo \(15\) .
  4. Find a positive multiplicative inverse of \(77\) modulo \(15\) .
  5. Find a multiplicative inverse of \(15\) modulo \(77\) .

Meeting Part 2: Quiz Q10 covering Epp 4th Edition Section 8.4 (Some concepts in 8.4 also appeared in 8.2 and 8.3)




Quiz Q10 on Wed Nov 30 Covers Section 8.4

Fri Dec 2


Sections to Discuss:

Epp 4th Edition Section 8.4 Modular Arithmetic with Applications to Cryptography

  • Exercises: 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, 12, 14, 15, 16, 19, 22, 26, 31, 33, 36, 39, 42
  • Video: A video has not been prepared for Section 8.4

Intro to RSA Cryptography

Roman Simkins Class Presentation CP5: Finding a Multiplicative Inverse Modulo \(n\): Observe that \(9\) and \(44\) are relatively prime. Mimicking the steps of Example 8.4.7 and 8.4.8, find a positive number that is a multiplicative inverse of \(9\), modulo 44.

Jake Schneider Class Presentation CP5: Compute \(4^9 \ (\text{mod }69)\). Explain your result using an \(n=dq+r\) equation.

Grace Smith Class Presentation CP5: Compute \(13^5 \ (\text{mod }69)\). Explain your result using an \(n=dq+r\) equation.

Mark B: Introduce RSA Cryptography, with the Handout on RSA Cryptography .

Students: Break into two groups and do the RSA Activity .





Week 16 (Mon Dec 7 through Fri Dec 11)

Final Exam on Mon Dec 5 from 10:10am - 12:10pm in Morton 218

The Exam will be seven problems, 30 points each.

  1. A problem about negating a statement that may include IF-THEN, AND, OR as well as Quantifiers (Chapter 3 concepts)
  2. A problem about the converse, contrapositive, inverse and negation of a universal conditional statement. (Chapter 3 concepts)
  3. Choose one (Chapter 4 concepts):
    • Prove or disprove a statement about even and odd numbers
    • Prove or disprove a statement about prime and composite numbers
    • Prove or disprove a statement about divisibility
  4. Prove a statement by proving its contrapositive. (Chapter 4 concepts)
  5. Prove a statement by induction. (Chapter 5.2 or 5.3 concepts)
  6. One of these five problems: 8.4 # 5, 6, 9, 10, 11 (The description for this problem changed on Saturday morning. I want to be sure that you spend a bit of time reviewing the basic properties of modular congruence that are the core of modular arithmetic . Note that 9,11 are the proofs of Theorem 8.4.3 Parts 1,2,4. The proof of Theorem 8.4.3 Part 2 is done in the book.)
  7. Given integers \(a\) and \(b\), find \(\text{gcd}(a,b)\) and find a linear combination of \(a\) and \(b\) that equals \(\text{gcd}(a,b)\). (Chapter 8.4 concepts)

I will make the study guide more precise once I have the exam written. Meanwhile, your study approach should be the following:

  • Top Priority: Study graded Quiz & Exam problems (on the topics above) that you got right and make sure that you can still do those problems. That is the low-hanging fruit: the stuff that you once knew well. Those skills should come back to you the quickest.
  • Second Priority: Study graded Quiz & Exam problems (on the topics above) that you got wrong . See if you can figure them out.
  • Third Priority: Review Suggested Homework Problems (on the topics above) that you have done before. (Check to see if there are answers in the back of the book, or similar examples in the book.)
  • Fourth Priority: Do Suggested Homework Problems (on the topics above) that you have not done before. (Check to see if there are answers in the back of the book, or similar examples in the book.)
  • Lower Priority: Sleep, eat, bathe, go to work at your job, study for your other classes, feed your pets.




Link to a pdf copy of the Calendar .

Grading:

Grading for MATH 3070/5070 Section 100
2022 - 2023 Fall Semester

During the course, you will accumulate a Points Total of up to 1000 possible points .

  • Presentations: 5 Presentations (during Meetings) @ 10 points each = 50 points possible
  • Quizzes: 10 quizzes @ 20 points each = 200 points possible
  • Exams: 3 Exams @ 180 points each for a total of 540 points possible
  • Final Exam: 210 points possible

At the end of the semester, your Points Total will be divided by \(1000\) to get a percentage, and then converted into your Course Letter Grade using the 85%, 70%, 55%, 40% Grading Scale described below.

The 85%, 70%, 55%, 40% Grading Scale is used on all graded items in this course, and is used in computing your Course Letter Grade .

  • A grade of A, A- means that you mastered all concepts, with no significant gaps.
    • If \(90\% \leq score \), then letter grade is A .
    • If \(85\% \leq score < 90\%\), then letter grade is A- .
  • A grade of B+, B, B- means that you mastered all essential concepts and many advanced concepts, but have some significant gap.
    • If \(80\% \leq score < 85\%\), then letter grade is B+ .
    • If \(75\% \leq score < 80\% \), then letter grade is B .
    • If \(70\% \leq score < 75\%\), then letter grade is B- .
  • A grade of C+, C, C- means that you mastered most essential concepts and some advanced concepts, but have many significant gaps.
    • If \(65\% \leq score < 70\%\), then letter grade is C+ .
    • If \(60\% \leq score < 65\%\), then letter grade is C .
    • If \(55\% \leq score < 60\%\), then letter grade is C- .
  • A grade of D+, D, D- means that you mastered some essential concepts.
    • If \(50\% \leq score < 55\%\), then letter grade is D+ .
    • If \(45\% \leq score < 50\% \), then letter grade is D .
    • If \(40\% \leq score < 45\%\), then letter grade is D- .
  • A grade of F means that you did not master essential concepts.
    • If \(0\% \leq score < 40\%\), then letter grade is F .

Keeping Track of Your Current Grade

During the semester, you can keep track of your scores on all the Graded Items: Class Presentations, Quizzes, Exam, Final Exam . (You can also find scores for all those items in the Blackboard Gradebook . Of course, you can also find your Quiz and Exam scores by just looking at your graded Quizzes and Exams.) Using this Grade Calculation Worksheet , can determine your Current Grade throughout the semester.

Here is a sample of a partially filled out Grade Calculation Worksheet .

Two things that are not part of your course grade

  • Attendance: Attendance is recorded but is not part of your course grade
  • Exercises: There is a list of Suggested Exercises on this web page. To succeed in the course, you will need to do lots of them. But these are not graded and are not part of your course grade.

link .


page maintained by Mark Barsamian , last updated Dec 4, 2022

View Site in Mobile | Classic
Share by: