I am following up on the message I sent the CPN on Friday. In the attached document, I start with a modified version of the broad definition of species I proposed in my last message that we adopt in the code. I then go through each of the changes proposed by Nico, Brent and David Baum, proposing alternatives in those cases where I disagree with them. At this point, what I am looking for is the committee's reaction to the general approach I've taken. I am assuming that even if the committee likes the approach, some of the wording will need fine-tuning. I look forward to your comments. Cheers, Phil -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: alternate species proposal.doc Type: application/msword Size: 78336 bytes Desc: alternate species proposal.doc Url : http://listserv.ohio.edu/pipermail/cpn/attachments/20120115/29169ac4/attachment-0001.doc
(740) 593–9381 | Building 21, The Ridges
Ohio University | Athens OH 45701 | 740.593.1000 ADA Compliance | © 2018 Ohio University . All rights reserved.