Dear colleagues, I have now read carefully Phil's suggestions, which I approve. I have made a few very minor suggestions in the annotated attached file (with changes tracked). Best wishes, Michel On 16/01/12 02:23, Cantino, Philip wrote: > I am following up on the message I sent the CPN on Friday. In the attached document, I start with a modified version of the broad definition of species I proposed in my last message that we adopt in the code. I then go through each of the changes proposed by Nico, Brent and David Baum, proposing alternatives in those cases where I disagree with them. At this point, what I am looking for is the committee's reaction to the general approach I've taken. I am assuming that even if the committee likes the approach, some of the wording will need fine-tuning. > > I look forward to your comments. > > Cheers, > Phil > > > >
> CPN mailing list > CPN at listserv.ohio.edu > http://listserv.ohio.edu/mailman/listinfo/cpn -- UMR 7207 Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle Batiment de Géologie Case postale 48 43 rue Buffon F-75231 Paris cedex 05 FRANCE http://tolweb.org/notes/?note_id=3669 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://listserv.ohio.edu/pipermail/cpn/attachments/20120116/ac104565/attachment-0001.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Cantino's species proposal.doc Type: application/msword Size: 77312 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://listserv.ohio.edu/pipermail/cpn/attachments/20120116/ac104565/attachment-0001.doc
(740) 593–9381 | Building 21, The Ridges
Ohio University | Athens OH 45701 | 740.593.1000 ADA Compliance | © 2018 Ohio University . All rights reserved.